From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EE0ABA for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:24:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145FB0 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E950108039B; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:22:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:150709:voisine@gmail.com::2e5399QOOs8SyqVo:bFIvn X-Hashcash: 1:25:150709:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::EXUjAQzOym=cJSx6:b4YmD X-Hashcash: 1:25:150709:DKBryant@gmail.com::+eA2it78EvgeGNUr:FzPd From: Luke Dashjr To: Aaron Voisine Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:22:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.1-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) References: <201507060424.57070.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201507090622.43214.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed transactions with a bounty. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:24:00 -0000 On Thursday, July 09, 2015 6:17:03 AM Aaron Voisine wrote: > Do you have any idea how much hashing power is using CPFP? It's a useful > metric for wallet developers to know what sort of confirmation times they > might be able to get when attempting to use it. Not sure. At least 4% (Eligius)?