From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:55:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150821055534.GA27259@muck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcZJEe4fz4dLYKeOzC0CWbM=-o92BvEF0qiGvNwyMjrEiA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2309 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:48:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> If this is widely deployed + enabled, what is the impact to current wallets
> in use?
See my comment on the recently-opened issue, reproduced below. In short,
not all that much, especially if we adopt my suggestion of having the
Core implementation accept and respond to bloom filter requests from
non-upgraded clients regardless of whether or not NODE_BLOOM was set
until some fixed upgrade deadline in the future.
Note that since the last time NODE_BLOOM was proposed, the landcape for
(lite-)SPV clients has changed significantly in a few key ways:
1) @mikehearn's [Cartographer](https://github.com/mikehearn/httpseed)
seed protocol has been created and deployed in production to allow
(lite-)SPV clients to find nodes supporting arbitrary service bits,
notable NODE_GETUTXOs.
2) Bloom filter usage has declined significantly, as lite-SPV clients
are moving towards using centralized, trusted, servers run by the wallet
authors. For instance
[Mycelium](https://github.com/mycelium-com/wallet),
[GreenBits](https://github.com/greenaddress/GreenBits),
[AirBitz](https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3etohn/whats_wrong_with_breadwallet/ctirou5),
and [Electrum](https://electrum.org/#home) all fall in this category.
3) Bloom filters [have been found](http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/763) to
have severe privacy issues, offering essentially no privacy at all.
Under many threat models a small number of trusted servers pose less
privacy security risk than connecting to random, sybil-attackable, peers
using unencrypted connections and giving those peers very accurate
wallet contents information.
4) Finally, Bloom filters still have [unsolved DoS attack
issues](https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3hjak7/the_hard_work_of_core_devs_not_xt_makes_bitcoin/cu9xntf?context=3),
that will get significantly worse under upcoming blocksize increase
proposals.
Re: service bit identifier, I'd just pick 1<<3
-https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/6578#issuecomment-133226943
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 4:46 [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP Matt Corallo
2015-08-21 5:38 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-21 5:42 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-21 17:55 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-21 22:06 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-22 1:08 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-22 1:48 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-24 15:19 ` Tom Harding
2015-08-24 17:39 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-22 1:08 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-21 5:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-08-21 5:55 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2015-08-21 6:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-08-21 6:07 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-21 22:15 ` Chris Pacia
2015-08-21 22:25 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-21 23:08 ` Tom Harding
2015-08-24 15:21 ` Mike Hearn
2015-08-21 8:31 ` Andreas Schildbach
2015-08-21 17:53 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-24 15:29 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2015-08-24 17:37 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-24 17:41 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2015-08-24 17:58 ` Eric Lombrozo
2015-08-24 18:00 ` Peter Todd
2015-08-24 18:07 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-24 18:15 ` Eric Lombrozo
2015-08-24 18:28 ` Matt Corallo
2015-08-24 18:30 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2015-08-24 18:33 ` Eric Lombrozo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150821055534.GA27259@muck \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgarzik@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox