From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8127898D for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3465D12E for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wijp15 with SMTP id p15so84904558wij.0 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:41:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0327txVpeHzNrdsSq2sznQNq6Y+MSRxRGCXQoBpiouY=; b=XMbVJj/x6rL3jEO4l4h4YxozzrRVHxbR1dAwSkYf7gGoarJELhv6trDtjBFJtycL3P ZRTGNraM91OxK/QmhEYnNNe7mzgcUN9qEM7h+zfAAVsfR/YeOhvsKSrOrinoEm2JYnMi HlZww8LvqRPKkTdIw57oCHn8y40yCUVo2TsyLPlGJE94onGHpcWCVBsNQjiW+TkdcBJv yCc9iY20np2kHCD6o/GY/KUm0Rf41ubpYw+hBpUlmrjaO4LtNx3QluYr9rWKFZou9qrF WM5lGlAEST0CsXKclHdY/FwvZfTxQPCKCf4J1Cj4TrA52cXc25HheQY6awxhTxYsenfh RKXw== X-Received: by 10.180.85.163 with SMTP id i3mr13979088wiz.1.1440438091922; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amethyst.visucore.com (dhcp-089-098-228-253.chello.nl. [89.98.228.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2sm24163125wjq.5.2015.08.24.10.41.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:41:43 +0200 From: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" To: Matt Corallo Message-ID: <20150824174141.GA7441@amethyst.visucore.com> References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com> <20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com> <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:41:34 -0000 On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo wrote: > Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen > which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that > it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is > distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but > not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some > proposals may make this more useful in the future)"? Yes, it makes sense to not explicitly exclude it. Looks good to me. Wladimir