From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <laanwj@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8127898D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.212.181])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3465D12E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:41:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wijp15 with SMTP id p15so84904558wij.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
	bh=0327txVpeHzNrdsSq2sznQNq6Y+MSRxRGCXQoBpiouY=;
	b=XMbVJj/x6rL3jEO4l4h4YxozzrRVHxbR1dAwSkYf7gGoarJELhv6trDtjBFJtycL3P
	ZRTGNraM91OxK/QmhEYnNNe7mzgcUN9qEM7h+zfAAVsfR/YeOhvsKSrOrinoEm2JYnMi
	HlZww8LvqRPKkTdIw57oCHn8y40yCUVo2TsyLPlGJE94onGHpcWCVBsNQjiW+TkdcBJv
	yCc9iY20np2kHCD6o/GY/KUm0Rf41ubpYw+hBpUlmrjaO4LtNx3QluYr9rWKFZou9qrF
	WM5lGlAEST0CsXKclHdY/FwvZfTxQPCKCf4J1Cj4TrA52cXc25HheQY6awxhTxYsenfh
	RKXw==
X-Received: by 10.180.85.163 with SMTP id i3mr13979088wiz.1.1440438091922;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amethyst.visucore.com (dhcp-089-098-228-253.chello.nl.
	[89.98.228.253])
	by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2sm24163125wjq.5.2015.08.24.10.41.31
	(version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:41:43 +0200
From: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Message-ID: <20150824174141.GA7441@amethyst.visucore.com>
References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com>
	<20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:41:34 -0000

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen
> which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that
> it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is
> distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but
> not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some
> proposals may make this more useful in the future)"?

Yes, it makes sense to not explicitly exclude it. 
Looks good to me.

Wladimir