From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B6BB36 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149095.authsmtp.com (outmail149095.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.95]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F55153 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7OI0oQI058032; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:00:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from muck (c-67-188-9-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.9.126]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7OI0jbB079959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:00:48 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:44 -0700 From: Peter Todd To: Matt Corallo Message-ID: <20150824180044.GA5729@muck> References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com> <20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com> <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com> X-Server-Quench: 0d0f93df-4a8a-11e5-b398-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdAYUGUATAgsB AmMbWl1eUF17XWs7 bQ1PbA1VfENQXgds T01BRU1TWkFvfmUB XExsUh57fgBPNnh1 YU8sXiRbCk15IRBg Rh9cRHAHZDJldTIc WUhFdwNWdQpKLx5A PgF4GhFYa3VsNCMk FAgyOXU9MCtqYB5Y XAAWLE4TR0lDOBkQ aicoORIIOB9Nfz80 Nxs9J1JUNmcpWgAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 67.188.9.126/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:00:53 -0000 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrot= e: > Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen > which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that > it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is > distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but > not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some > proposals may make this more useful in the future)"? ACK --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000008aa6cf51dfde20be1d54e671494a44fb7f252fd4e913162 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJV21vIXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwOGFhNmNmNTFkZmRlMjBiZTFkNTRlNjcxNDk0YTQ0ZmI3 ZjI1MmZkNGU5MTMxNjIvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udwhaAf/Z81IH4eIfQ/Y3mh8Z/bInaSQ Be1cUxQzKPvyp/MxXpHzEcetz+l7/5KHmA1O0VY2+/jynWMuQJ25kc//6RDPT6EB /w/FghP/9Zo6S9C2iLgvJmxSP1Bfxo8fE5JPEAm8Ymi5kiapkGi6VQpCYUfQcG6x B3Jj2xdsgpSlYypsMxHvWnx+hd71+7d+dCvf7NWRHsVH2/rSvQIRaUi+PRV6zKOC sulVeWjiK9mHCrfF5VAhO7nYrw2Gfs8zo63vfiEaZaVCGzdgn8QBVpwhY7r8z7hl dNWtAT23taRL9LxXTVWnHbePs437GHqP3vNnvJXWGqjDZbdUBn/Axo91gbJ1Mg== =owxv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--