From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF72E13F3 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:32:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8650FA0 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FB4CE0270 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:32:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=Y4/nIrrxV4dFmJ1kjzXto640Wn85aaYdnCKNFnnzuEY=; b=jUm/UxdD2nzvEvTvnaVBfI03BFDvBt5+wWdVHTqupyMDOCP/AH+DCB/7ixTq6F1n2/3DUEX4E18r9RuRiQ3jVyQHp1dsGLxuuxuOynzP3CSipCxs5vBsm8YziOgRL7UowB2XoqTMq7zXqyXACZ7PqhJZ4UD3t4C6EKbqA4sDwQLvHb8NR7IoDk3oiRXmVkLXv/p/m8EF522AsLA3BYWWcPtIusTz4HkfKVtBaZSxVDXfUWzV6XWmX718zqIHTG1/FyM1VibLw6YPpyE9h5gUj2XO3ZNkYI//rJMJoBN3bSkwta3F1ae/0zqqu8wLa5Rc/CXU8+065W37b/5Y8x78sw== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w7.hushmail.com [65.39.178.32]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 085D2404B9; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:32:55 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:32:55 +0300 To: "Eric Voskuil" , "Peter Todd" , "Matt Corallo" From: "NxtChg" In-Reply-To: <55FD225B.1050402@voskuil.org> References: <55F9E47D.50507@mattcorallo.com> <55FC6EBF.9090504@mattcorallo.com> <20150919014710.GD22598@muck> <20150919060639.A775A404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FD0737.1080008@voskuil.org> <20150919072714.D3349404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FD1122.5030107@voskuil.org> <20150919075758.820CC404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FD225B.1050402@voskuil.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150919133256.085D2404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list , Libbitcoin Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:32:57 -0000 >Your argument is that the state is not a threat to a system >designed to deprive the state of seigniorage, because the state will see that >system as too important? Well, if you look at governments from the point of youtube illuminati videos, then, yeah, I guess my position would seem a bit off. But in that case no threat model or small blocks are gonna save you. As history shows, even if you go as deep as Dread Pirate Roberts, you will eventually be caught and prosecuted. So start building SilkRoadCoin, which only works via TOR, has ASIC-resistant algorithm and 10 Kb blocks. Then you might have a tiny chance. Most of us subscribed to a global "electronic cash system" and we intend to continue using Bitcoin for that.