From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7CC18CE for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:21:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BDC1AD for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF5201080196; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:20:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:151001:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::RkFlCr3PIoU1yQo+:1p1c X-Hashcash: 1:25:151001:marcel@jamin.net::Sj5=uCwSVjUCkL/1:ax1wl X-Hashcash: 1:25:151001:btcdrak@gmail.com::hR5kG8oHXc639F+c:bJZha From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Marcel Jamin Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:20:22 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.6-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) References: <20150924112555.GA21355@amethyst.visucore.com> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201510012020.23821.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:21:27 -0000 On Thursday, October 01, 2015 9:41:25 AM Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 > > I'd say it's safe to say that it's used in production. But it's not *ready* to be used in production. :( For 1.0, I would expect: libbitcoinconsensus: an API that makes implementing a full node practical. Bitcoin Core GUI: reasonably usable safely by non-technical people. Bitcoin Core Daemon: a reasonably safe wallet (currently blocked by backup- resistant accounting system) Luke