From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85E311D84 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD5FF0 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E215401CA for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=xcxhehmRmFpqZZMa5kuicWp/KIZ3osra1l5flAc3bYs=; b=V7icQ1Lt/+Pqvr+Zym6OHcky3OMl+ab3FENHKq0tm2LomA8Um+y1sz+BV21ew5woDSAfM/OUuR6PagYhqgvpItXJ3msq7je5DRrO/RcYsFbXsBai+83YHnAP4h8FoUtv7UIUpMmQNXl1Q9zHJD3XCqJjnGqA7xkYbekefgmpFH33sjAqDa8gfu/48nnnuIVPLYCDdxrkP+6UAXStXh3RFBGlkHUXo6wyX7zvhizAHqpsLEfiA3s1QrsBsYUk2Dn+/CTZJWN8vR6wgtfFs6KxPnvAliB2HpDmXoN/+3LbnlAZGowVetJlYvx/c3hJohYF8+7s52tvYP8GWLG+SC828A== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.83]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id A0FA720109; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:20 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:56:20 +0300 To: "Peter R" , "Paul Sztorc" From: "NxtChg" In-Reply-To: <5570C084-0C2D-4B79-A78E-B25699600EA9@gmx.com> References: <5612ACF3.2080006@gmail.com> <5570C084-0C2D-4B79-A78E-B25699600EA9@gmx.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20151005175620.A0FA720109@smtp.hushmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] =?utf-8?q?This_thread_is_not_about_the_soft/hard_fo?= =?utf-8?q?rk=09technical_debate?= X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 17:56:21 -0000 >Each implementation could have its own governance model >and design objectives and use techniques like BIP101’s 750/1000 >signalling mechanism to activate changes that may be desirable to >the community. I was shushed here 3 months ago for the same suggestion :) http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009294.html