From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com>
Cc: John Sacco <johnsock@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Block size doubles at each reward halving with max block size of 32M
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:39:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201511130639.53410.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFzgq-xmXcEKN0_0e8de0UDOJEXuivbz986-dsSC5BCYLA2t1A@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, November 13, 2015 2:56:55 AM Chun Wang via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> * 2 MB, 210000 <= height < 420000;
It's impossible to have the entire network upgraded in the past.
Furthermore, 1 MB is already too large a block size today. While blocks don't
need to be as big as the limit, it's better to have the limit approximate what
is reasonably possible without straining the network. So while your proposed
schedule change might be workable (if miners can be trusted to keep actual
block size under 50% pending future improvements), I prefer the proposal
beginning at the next subsidy halving (which we're well on the way to).
Luke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 23:47 [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Block size doubles at each reward halving with max block size of 32M John Sacco
2015-11-13 2:56 ` Chun Wang
2015-11-13 3:37 ` John Sacco
2015-11-13 7:49 ` Btc Drak
2015-11-13 9:50 ` John Sacco
2015-11-13 10:52 ` Luke Dashjr
[not found] ` <1447430469019.e0ee1956@Nodemailer>
2015-11-13 22:28 ` Luke Dashjr
2015-11-14 0:02 ` digitsu
2015-11-14 9:31 ` Adam Back
2015-11-14 10:52 ` Jorge Timón
2015-11-14 21:11 ` Luke Dashjr
[not found] ` <CADZB0_Z3Kf4GW0VATjb10kJF0aFgyFOcqX_=y+LFoUpsi+TRUA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-14 21:27 ` Luke Dashjr
2015-11-15 12:16 ` Jorge Timón
[not found] ` <CABEog-XUNt9kDS7Mc0XYFjm5ePUT0m1YaAoG9VypTCiGLBongQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-18 10:15 ` Jorge Timón
2015-11-13 6:39 ` Luke Dashjr [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201511130639.53410.luke@dashjr.org \
--to=luke@dashjr.org \
--cc=1240902@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johnsock@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox