From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D1994E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:53:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF4BA8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:53:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB69738A5FE3;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151113:johnsock@gmail.com::O/YfOtYuv9o4BOcO:dza97
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151113:btcdrak@gmail.com::E/Sr5XzsViC08CQy:acH8j
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151113:1240902@gmail.com::bRUxKaSAYNUDgld2:hI74
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151113:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::1PR+Zpb1xDDaUB5m:IbAu
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: John Sacco <johnsock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:52:57 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.9-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAEkt4Xu6vBFtRVEnXCWJa0f9OYi9wLKwToxc3p+KPfMuV5y0GA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzu+69bMP4mJZ4pUA1JLc8GXaUQfORGzTDivnLwQ8Zw9+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEkt4XvGzkFipDwqD_m+56+vWxRaF+rRy8ydJJ7tqibcyjWJ0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEkt4XvGzkFipDwqD_m+56+vWxRaF+rRy8ydJJ7tqibcyjWJ0g@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201511131052.58623.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Block size doubles at each reward halving
	with max block size of 32M
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:53:38 -0000

On Friday, November 13, 2015 9:50:47 AM John Sacco wrote:
> * 2 MB, height 420,000 < 630,000; (fork active when 75% of last 1,000 blocks
> signal support and block 420,000 reached, ~July 2016)

I'd leave out the block signalling. It isn't really useful, complicates the 
whole BIP, and mistakenly gives people the idea that miners have a choice in 
hardforks.

Luke