From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56364F88 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:50:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1AF101 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BAF938A9581 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:50:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:160130:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::D09z6zhj6R=f/JEy:HzRN From: Luke Dashjr To: Bitcoin Dev Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:50:02 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.13-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201601301850.03469.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SBL, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] SegWit GBT updates X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:50:09 -0000 I've completed an initial draft of a BIP for updating getblocktemplate for segregated witness here: https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/segwit_gbt/bip-segwit-gbt.mediawiki Please review and comment (especially with regard to the changes in the sigoplimits handling). (Note: libblkmaker's reference implementation is at this time incompatible with the "last output" rule in this BIP.) Thanks, Luke