public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Gavin <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardfork bit BIP
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:44:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208024432.GA21065@sapphire.erisian.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D7B0DA3F-8D4C-48B5-88AB-0D6F4BFCD77D@gmail.com>

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 03:20:27PM -0500, Gavin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:27 PM, <jl2012@xbt.hk> <jl2012@xbt.hk> wrote:
> > Normal version number only suggests softforks, which is usually not a concern for SPV clients.
> Soft forks affect the security of low-confirmation (zero or one) transactions sent to SPV wallets even more than hard forks,

This isn't true for soft-forks that only forbid transactions that would
already be rejected for forwarding and mining due to being non-standard.

> and because many users and businesses choose convenience over airtight security I would argue transaction validation rule changes are a VERY big concern for lightweight clients.

I agree on that point; but ensuring soft-forks only affect non-standard
transactions already addresses that concern in every way I've been able
to discover.

Cheers,
aj



      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 17:14 [bitcoin-dev] Hardfork bit BIP jl2012
2016-02-04 17:36 ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-04 17:56   ` jl2012
2016-02-04 18:00     ` Bryan Bishop
2016-02-04 18:24     ` Tier Nolan
2016-02-04 18:19   ` Peter Todd
2016-02-04 18:29 ` Luke Dashjr
2016-02-05 10:20   ` Jorge Timón
2016-02-04 19:36 ` Gregory Maxwell
2016-02-04 22:15   ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-05  9:58     ` Jorge Timón
2016-02-07 19:27     ` jl2012
2016-02-07 20:20       ` Gavin
2016-02-08  2:44         ` Anthony Towns [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160208024432.GA21065@sapphire.erisian.com.au \
    --to=aj@erisian.com.au \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gavinandresen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox