From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B94F70 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:44:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk [62.13.148.112]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEBCD2 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u18MiP2c091325; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:44:25 GMT Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u18MiN32014579 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:44:24 GMT Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E02F440012; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by savin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED9C713FCD4; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:44:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by savin (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1000); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:41:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:41:00 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Luke Dashjr Message-ID: <20160208224100.GA25684@savin.petertodd.org> References: <201602082217.57146.luke@dashjr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201602082217.57146.luke@dashjr.org> X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:luke@dashjr.org::6Ntmln/HOwUevuUx:02Qwb9 X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::RdM3ne4THSnDg97a: 00000000000000000000000SdF/b X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:stephen@bitpay.com::YHWyyMABPnz7KBkI:0000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000P05T3 X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:gavinandresen@gmail.com::D5LcRM5H40zOVXnM:00000000000000 00000000000000000000000Dh56Y X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:genjix@riseup.net::0kqNAD/2YKg9d3KR:00000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000OxLQD X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:hearn@vinumeris.com::5XhOOziDz2K7H7SG:000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000tCj4 X-Hashcash: 1:28:160208:pieter.wuille@gmail.com::RLmNSzgvQLb2gybE:00000000000000 000000000000000000000007pnPK X-Server-Quench: 80adca6a-ceb5-11e5-bcde-0015176ca198 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR bQdMdgoUHlAWAgsB AmAbWVZeVFl7W2c7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUQRgfEV/ BRweUx13cAwIenpw ZEEsVnAKCBcrcxdg ERsGEHAHZDJldTJM BBVFdwNVdQJNeEwU a1l3GhFYa3VsNCMk FAgyOXU9MCtqYA50 ekkjLFQbRQ4QAjcg Wgtq X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:23:42 +0000 Cc: Stephen Pair , Mike Hearn , Pieter Wuille , Bitcoin Dev , Amir Taaki Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:44:35 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:55PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to upgrad= e=20 > five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs ACKs fro= m the=20 > champions of the BIPs: >=20 > BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen It may be good to update BIP 50 with the new information that calling it a "hard fork" misses subtleties about what happened during that fork. In particular, 0.7 rejection of the chain was non-deterministic, based on having seen a re-org in a specific way. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000001ae7ca66e52359d67c407a739fde42b83ecc746d3ab735d --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWuRl4XhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMWFlN2NhNjZlNTIzNTlkNjdjNDA3YTczOWZkZTQyYjgz ZWNjNzQ2ZDNhYjczNWQvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkftBSwgApiZr1NBYxdWt4dWrliF0lDjK EZ7blnhvnwZ0l/UXMPNg+JYKDYbdJnISlZE9OI5zdJ7NhTHduu7FZn5fZnryZD4f kCE4bZ0vx732LOT85JPKqDbFOVD2qpby6b1lSGj+FDo5pr9BXWSynNJDZvukcVtw 2sPA8YpeYSNyzTwGLAzgRc6CMEQWP2VT6F5vAQYEHbpJAWRLs3m5ypgV55XzxDDJ JRXXDkXM4pW3C4iRDdnkBzcbjXsqBZ6VZWYG9cOlRutr5AN7FBJ0AUNo+bujyNpU yAYMC9NVl+Z8c6y45CP/B8fmgc7zJhiq+Z/wSwdKILq00Ca0zOGmg+KigiYd5A== =xYgP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--