From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B0F383D for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (unknown [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD27CE2 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (adsl-98-70-231-167.gnv.bellsouth.net [98.70.231.167]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E571138A17C7; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:160810:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::eMSIDzW2A8sV5nDr:aLkf= X-Hashcash: 1:25:160810:danielhoffman699@gmail.com::uqiXJGxUxytRZejd:9kjj X-Hashcash: 1:25:160810:trevinhofmann@gmail.com::ojq7AIkjgs=rrILI:a3D0 From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Daniel Hoffman Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:04 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.18-gentoo; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201608100036.05930.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:31 -0000 On Tuesday, August 09, 2016 11:06:20 PM Daniel Hoffman via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Is this good enough to warrant an official BIP number? Yeah, let's call it BIP 170. Next step is to: - Fix the BIP number in the file - Format it in the usual BIP mediawiki format instead of markdown - Add it to a fork of the bitcoin/bips git repository - Open a pull request against bitcoin/bips P.S. Why are telephones considered 4-tone? DTMF is 16-tone IIRC?