From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEDB71 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:12:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (unknown [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341F4FD for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D40738AB6EA for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:12:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:160823:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::AqyF6xIKHowcQY4h:bspLM From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:12:11 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.18-gentoo; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; ) X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu X-PRIORITY: 2 (High) Priority: urgent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201608232012.12588.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Status updates (including to Active/Final Status) - BIP 39, BIP 43, BIP 44, BIP 67, BIP 111, BIP 125, BIP 130 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:12:29 -0000 A number of BIPs seem ready for updating to Final Status. If there are no objections, I will update these in 2 weeks: BIP 39: Mnemonic code for generating deterministic keys - Used by many wallets and hundreds of thousands of users. BIP 44: Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets - Appears to be implemented by multiple wallets. BIP 67: Deterministic Pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses through public key sorting - Implementations in multiple wallet software exist. BIP 125: Opt-in Full Replace-by-Fee Signaling - Implemented in Bitcoin Core and derivatives; appears to be in regular use on the network. BIP 130: sendheaders message - Implemented in Bitcoin Core and derivatives. Also, BIP 43 (Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets) is an informational BIP which appears to be guiding to some extent the creation of new BIPs; therefore I propose its Status be upgraded to Active. I will make this update in 2 weeks also, if no objections. Additionally, BIP 111 (NODE_BLOOM service bit) has been implemented in Bitcoin Core and derivatives; it is unclear if used by clients yet. Can developers of such clients please comment and let me know: 1) if their software supports this BIP already; 2) if not, do they intend to support it in the future? If and only if there are any clients using this service bit already, I will update BIP 111 to Final Status in 2 weeks also. Thanks, Luke