From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F0D9B66 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:09:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E25E134 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:a45d:823b:2d27:961c]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA4ED38A179D; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:08:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:170109:ctpacia@gmail.com::3yUkPJWJ/SGsUoG9:a15=V X-Hashcash: 1:25:170109:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::2/ecGtJSDCC8YdU7:b8qqv From: Luke Dashjr To: Chris , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:08:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.4.39-gentoo; KDE/4.14.24; x86_64; ; ) References: <8c64f5db-7cac-3fde-85c0-a75d752c4192@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8c64f5db-7cac-3fde-85c0-a75d752c4192@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201701090308.58360.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mutli-push op_return X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 03:09:30 -0000 On Monday, January 09, 2017 2:09:09 AM Chris via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Would there be an objection to making op_return outputs with two > pushdatas standard (same max data size)? Standards (BIPs) need to describe a specific use case and protocol for doing it. As you note, the default policy on most nodes is to allow such outputs. Luke