From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A BIP proposal for segwit addresses
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 18:34:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170507223429.GA23545@fedora-23-dvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBiPiLHZFoYY=gs6LT+Q2Kb5NmbVU05u7c+0WRPjveBJhQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1535 bytes --]
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 02:39:14PM -0700, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > I don't understand your comment about non-english speaking users.
> Obviously they cannot voice-communicate at all with only-english-speaking
> users, so there is no need to communicate voice-communicate addresses
> between them.
>
> I assume that Peter Todd is talking about cases where English speakers are
> interacting with non-native English speakers, who may know how to pronounce
> numbers or alphabetical characters, but not all special characters.
Exactly - knowledge of the English language isn't a binary. Equally, I don't
remember ever learning names of special characters in French class back in
elementary school, but I do recall us drilling the alphabet and especially
numbers repeatedly.
If I were trying to tell a French speaker a BTC address, I'd probably be able
to succesfully do it with bech32, but not with any encoding using special
characters.
> In general:
>
> In the past weeks people have contributed two new reference implementations
> (Haskell and Rust), and a C++ and Go one are underway (see
> https://github.com/sipa/bech32).
FWIW, I also did a partial rust implementation of just the Bech32 encoding for
a prototype non-BTC use-case. Other than the version number being it's own
"chunk" I found it very straight-forward to implement and I think it'll make
for a nice replacement for what otherwise would have been hex digests.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-07 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-20 21:35 [bitcoin-dev] A BIP proposal for segwit addresses Pieter Wuille
2017-03-21 16:16 ` Andreas Schildbach
2017-03-21 19:14 ` Peter Todd
2017-03-29 10:07 ` Andreas Schildbach
2017-03-30 4:50 ` Lucas Ontivero
2017-05-07 21:39 ` Pieter Wuille
2017-05-07 22:34 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2017-05-20 20:13 ` Pieter Wuille
2018-07-26 13:43 ` Russell O'Connor
2018-07-26 14:31 ` Russell O'Connor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170507223429.GA23545@fedora-23-dvm \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=pieter.wuille@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox