From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D899C0 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 01:45:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail148093.authsmtp.net (outmail148093.authsmtp.net [62.13.148.93]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8800E3FA for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 01:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8T1jm5S092266; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 02:45:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8T1jjFr054616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 02:45:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 883FE4010A; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 01:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D894C205E4; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:45:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:45:43 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Andreas Schildbach , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20170929014543.GB11956@savin.petertodd.org> References: <20170927160654.GA12492@savin.petertodd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Server-Quench: ea7da8a4-a4b7-11e7-a0cc-0015176ca198 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdAsUC1AEAgsB AmEbW1ZeVFh7XWQ7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUg0MAEZb cFweVx10dgMIfH95 Zwg3D3cPDUwrcVss RhxTCGwHMGB9OWBM A11YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXAShZ WAwWNhofUV4KBDcg RhcEVSkuGEAeDz4z KAEiJhYWEQ4YPkk/ PRM9XhoyEidXU1IF dwAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to BIP-173 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 01:45:52 -0000 --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-de= v wrote: > This feels redundant to me; the payment protocol already has an > expiration time. I'm well aware. As the payment protocol hasn't caught on - and doesn't fully overlap all the usecases that addresses do anyway - I think we should consi= der bringing this important feature to Bitcoin addresses too. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZzaXDAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7PccIAK9PfA3Ag3JSpul+aBrV5ZUk xfY+zfQS77h7jj7RzwvID/9vBu4izL3sLZO1e08opUveI86/NR+qt7eIeAmi7itP S8pES83AphHmF7VgCPtDcJruoLRKSYlWmW/crD4ENRWeDrOLKhzhBooy/hpu7N5E H/mC1aeeSJ2+9p4+jNGPnUZV/+EQ0N76YgR4aTeWzF9VMQHr+Hd3W8r01uE8VpvD BOLaJIKsyGVKZCDj416zHeuGMfgyItAJg0cPMVWiVe9CpIUa/UhDxoTaSaH04t8E 8F4ZL75V7LTEugOHHlHvTkm+K0JbJwYGHlhFev0HO0dB2nSQmWLdeCuYzIfyA3U= =hNwm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--