public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Marco Falke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:11:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201802142211.44293.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK51vgDaSMH96VmHxgLswVQTxGGjy4VU0VnT4CZ7H+WJrrTApw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 14 February 2018 10:01:46 PM Marco Falke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 123 suggests that BIPs in the consensus layer should be assigned a
> label "soft fork" or "hard fork". However, I think the differentiation
> into soft fork or hard fork should not be made for BIPs that document
> buried deployments. In contrast to soft forks and hard forks, buried
> deployments do not require community and miner coordination for a safe
> deployment.

They also do not require software coordination. Therefore, why should there be 
BIPs at all? Seems to me that we should instead add these documents to 
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/docs

That being said, I'm also okay with just adding an Annex to the original 
softfork/hardfork BIP describing each shortcut. It just seems annoying to have 
two BIPs for every protocol change: one for the change itself, and then 
another for implementation-specific shortcuts taken.

Luke


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 22:01 [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments Marco Falke
2018-02-14 22:11 ` Luke Dashjr [this message]
2018-02-14 22:20   ` Gregory Maxwell
2018-02-14 23:57 ` Eric Voskuil
2018-02-18 18:57   ` Marco Falke
2018-02-21 17:27     ` Eric Voskuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201802142211.44293.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=falke.marco@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox