From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC2AC58 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:15:54 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149056.authsmtp.com (outmail149056.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.56]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E27E5 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) by punt18.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5GKPBZF090324; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:25:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from user@petertodd.org) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x5GKP874045997 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:25:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from user@petertodd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19977401C2; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F62420052; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:25:06 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Emil Engler , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20190616202506.kjdpul473lutqhfw@petertodd.org> References: <205859a9-635a-e958-a03f-8d9a35e0da1a@emilengler.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvpasfxw6he5hxoe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Server-Quench: d65c806f-9074-11e9-960e-8434971169dc X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZIVwkA IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdwQUEkAaAgsB Am8bWVVeUlh7WWo7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcXAAfenwJ ARoeVhx7fgIIf3hy bAg2WHUIVER8I1t0 QklQCGwHMG59YWYf BV1QcwBQeQRLfxlM PgMxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXNClO XgcAMQ56 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:44:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] testnet4 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:41:21 -0000 --cvpasfxw6he5hxoe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be resetted just because there is a > (probably better) alternative for it. The testnet is still a thing and is > also used. Remember that the size of testnet itself is an important test; I've argued = in that past that we should consider making testnet *larger* than mainnet. The= re's good arguments against that too, but I personally think the current size is= a reasonable compromise. Of course, I personally tend to do all my testing on either internal regtest nodes, or directly on mainnet. But the fact that works for me is specific to the exact type of development I do and may not be applicable to you. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --cvpasfxw6he5hxoe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEFcyURjhyM68BBPYTJIFAPaXwkfsFAl0GpZ4ACgkQJIFAPaXw kfuFggf/XqSWvtn9qWSDQrWQmCkdokYN/FV4Hwi3ifc0Q6FFdEyeTSm4DLV3CDq1 /7HFzntVdwzmfgyqFZnhioBc9nIuKBux6VDcqWWKxBEbYq/rQblDYTlOx+R9M+1Z jmILaaty7HakgD2KgpVBS+rGkxq3xivnoyqCxBGBxB7bLBdGvJ4XxAKaQThR6YYT NUmAG+otzo6ARi1FNutf024CUSdKVFEADtdDPuuDtkPNyUU46/dlj6HaN1iGBKfa OWmehyRH6LJOdLkOUh68sj3Jsr6sT0kZwkj11ohO55o0PQaikcrw8vO81z0UuRaS DG99doL0PGr0oan6dluHQjGCs3Ok6A== =HSPp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvpasfxw6he5hxoe--