From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCF0F4A for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:05:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF87FE for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.lan (adsl-67-34-245-3.asm.bellsouth.net [67.34.245.3]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8907838A0DC3; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:04:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:190725:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::GAnhObZ9b=T7WFRT:cCvtp X-Hashcash: 1:25:190725:andreas@schildbach.de::B0gkc=8Fa1CrgOVz:dJ6fv From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Andreas Schildbach Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:04:25 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <59fad2b6-9b15-ffec-116e-91d27ce29f80@mattcorallo.com> In-Reply-To: X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201907250304.27179.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:32:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by default X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:05:50 -0000 On Tuesday 23 July 2019 14:47:18 Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > the DNS seed infrastructure among others can easily direct > > wallets to those nodes > > Last I checked none of the seeds did. But I agree this would be nice to > have. It's supported by default in sipa's bitcoin-seeder, which many DNS seeds us= e. My seed also currently requires NODE_BLOOM for *any* answers returned. (But I don't guarantee that will remain forever.) > As a side note, Coinbase just announced their 30M'th wallet. I'm > convinced this massive run into custodial wallets... Light wallets are just as bad for the network as custodial wallets. > IMHO, BIP 37 is the only scaling technology that has proven successful and > could =E2=80=93 if supported and improved rather than choked =E2=80=93 co= ntinue to help > holding against the bitbanks trend. Light wallets are not Bitcoin scaling. They are just trusting anonymous 3rd= =20 parties, which is harmful to Bitcoin. Luke