public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Emil Engler <me@emilengler.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of the term 'address'
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 11:32:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910061132.39215.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58e44347-6eee-a0c3-3b8a-965c7450780e@emilengler.com>

On Saturday 05 October 2019 21:57:48 Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello dear mailing list subscribers.
> Before I'll explain my idea here, I need to define a term first
>
> 'address':
> When I use the terms address, pubkey, etc., I mean the same: The Base58
> string

But a pubkey is not a Base58 string, and fundamentally different from an 
address. An address identifies the recipient and the purpose of the payment; 
a pubkey does not. The pubkey remains with the UTXO; an address does not.

> Ok now let's get into it:
> As you should know, sending bitcoins to an address more than once is a
> very bad approach.
> In my opinion the problem why so many people are still doing this is
> because of the term 'address' which is used in lots of wallets,
> implementations, BIP 21 and so on. It is a design issue.
> With the term 'address' most people identify things that are fixed and
> don't change really often (e.g postal address, IP address [depends on
> provider], Domain, E-Mail address, ...).
> Because of this most people compare bitcoin addresses with e-mail
> addresses and use this address to send the recipient money multiple times.

That problem would require using a different term than "address" to address.
A BIP is unlikely to do the job (though it may help).

> My suggestion would be to change the term address in wallets, the URI
> scheme and so on to something of the following options by a
> Informational/Process BIP:
>
> * Payment Password
> * Transaction Password
> * ...

Neither the address nor pubkey are a password...

Some possible alternative terms would be "invoice id", "payment token", etc.

> The guideline for the term should indicate that it is:
> * temporary
> * Something that identifies the recipient
>
> I've chosen 'password' because they can be used as a pseudonym to
> identify a person.
> This is already used in stuff like bank transfers where something like
> the transaction id should be used as the purpose or at universities
> there are student numbers.
> The first is probably a better example because student numbers aren't
> temporary.
>
> What do you think? Should I write a BIP for this or use another term?
> Feedback is most welcome :)
>
> Greetings,
> Emil Engler



  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-06 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-05 21:57 [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of the term 'address' Emil Engler
2019-10-06 11:32 ` Luke Dashjr [this message]
2019-10-06 16:06   ` Emil Engler
2019-10-09 19:32 ` Chris Belcher
2019-10-10 15:05   ` Emil Engler
2019-10-11  1:13     ` Lloyd Fournier
2019-10-11  2:00     ` Karl-Johan Alm
2019-10-11  4:22       ` Ariel Lorenzo-Luaces
2019-10-11 21:03         ` Emil Engler
2019-10-17 13:23           ` Marco Falke
2019-10-17 19:28             ` Emil Engler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201910061132.39215.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=me@emilengler.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox