From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC99DC000B for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4E4606AE for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dashjr.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoyHki-uwYON for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [IPv6:2001:470:88ff:2f::1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDFD60636 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.lan (unknown [12.153.231.213]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA90138A0019; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dashjr.org; s=zinan; t=1619384456; bh=JxE+WbGpHr+V9toTZ5TcDb8sLX0/ucC20Oj4KBYAQyU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=XJH07RnVrB/kme7imfogBbLkKetaclE5z6PJY8NGV+YUA4SWFRWyXhh0kz4QxqnWW 9MQCaDnR1pJz9EmnOpXAgpVPnDADOD7BVZWRumhny6AOCDBz8HhebbguPCwnLZ1n22 zLDUqgJR6yt87soPm50v+fGPm6OwUrfrN9SG133w= X-Hashcash: 1:25:210425:lf-lists@mattcorallo.com::r0nxcEQUl=8DXFag:aFffY X-Hashcash: 1:25:210425:antoine.riard@gmail.com::i/W7I9+WNp8K9d4F:V6PT X-Hashcash: 1:25:210425:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::E0WhEKGu7gePDKNH:n5+Q X-Hashcash: 1:25:210425:karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp::z17RU9TQM8OlGcY9:auAMj From: Luke Dashjr To: Matt Corallo Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org> <64807e52-14ea-198b-4caf-29be92e89655@mattcorallo.com> In-Reply-To: <64807e52-14ea-198b-4caf-29be92e89655@mattcorallo.com> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <202104252100.07296.luke@dashjr.org> Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:01:01 -0000 On Sunday 25 April 2021 20:29:44 Matt Corallo wrote: > If the BIP editor is deliberately refusing to accept changes which the > author's approval (which appears to be occurring here), It isn't. I am triaging BIPs PRs the same as I have for years, and will get to them all in due time, likely before the end of the month. Rather, what we have going on is a few bad actors trying to misportray the BIPs as an approval process so they can pretend ST is somehow official, or that the preexisting Core+Taproot client is "breaking" the spec. And to further their agenda, they have been harassing me demanding special treatment. I will not become an accomplice to this deception by giving special treatment, and will process the BIP PR neutrally according to the currently-defined BIP process. Despite the continual harassment, I have even made two efforts to try to (fairly) make things faster, and have been obstructed both times by ST advocates. It appears they intend to paint me as "deliberately refusing" (to use your words) in order to try to put Bitcoin and the BIP process under their control, and abuse it in the same manner in which they abused Bitcoin Core's usual standards (by releasing ST without community consensus). Luke