public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal draft: BIP43 "purpose" allocation for Ethereum
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:26:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2112201.An0daUyfG4@cherry> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFz7pMuMMmR=nrk9ho+0Gir-C7JVVn1GzA=6JsQV9NYF2WfP5w@mail.gmail.com>

Thinking about this a bit, I support this proposal for a BIP.
This is not Bitcoin, but address types are bound to meet in meat-space and 
it would be good to have a central place where this is defined.

I would very much appreciate someone that worked on BIP32/BIP43 itself to 
comment on the details.

Quoting bip 43;


"We encourage different schemes to apply for assigning a separate BIP
number and use the same number for purpose field, so addresses won't be
generated from overlapping BIP32 spaces."



On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 12:02:37 CEST Nick Johnson via bitcoin-dev 
wrote:
> <pre>
>   BIP: bip-nickjohnson-ethereum-purpose
>   Layer: Applications
>   Title: Ethereum purpose allocation for Deterministic Wallets
>   Author: Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org>
>   Status: Proposed
>   Type: Standards Track
>   Created: 2017-04-12
> </pre>
> 
> ==Abstract==
> 
> This BIP defines a logical hierarchy for deterministic wallets on the
> Ethereum blockchain based on an algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32
> from now on) and purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now
> on).
> 
> This BIP is a particular application of BIP43.
> 
> ==Motivation==
> 
> Because Ethereum is based on account balances rather than UTXO, the
> hierarchy defined by BIP44 is poorly suited. As a result, several
> competing derivation path strategies have sprung up for deterministic
> wallets, resulting in inter-client incompatibility. This BIP seeks to
> provide a path to standardise this in a fashion better suited to
> Ethereum's unique requirements.
> 
> ==Path levels==
> 
> We define the following 2 levels in BIP32 path:
> 
> <pre>
> m / purpose' / subpurpose' / *
> </pre>
> 
> Apostrophe in the path indicates that BIP32 hardened derivation is used.
> 
> Each level has a special meaning, described in the chapters below.
> 
> ===Purpose===
> 
> Purpose is a constant set to the hardened value of the BIP number assigned
> to this BIP (equivalently, the BIP number, bitwise ORed with 0x80000000)
> following the BIP43 recommendation.
> It indicates that the subtree of this node is used according to this
> specification.
> 
> Hardened derivation is used at this level.
> 
> ===Subpurpose===
> Subpurpose is set to the EIP number specifying the remainder of the BIP32
> derivation path. This permits new Ethereum-focused applications of
> deterministic wallets without needing to interface with the BIP process.
> 
> Hardened derivation is used at this level.
> 
> ==Reference== * [[bip-0032.mediawiki|BIP32 - Hierarchical Deterministic
> Wallets]] * [[bip-0043.mediawiki|BIP43 - Purpose Field for Deterministic
> Wallets]]


-- 
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel


      reply	other threads:[~2017-04-14 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 10:02 [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal draft: BIP43 "purpose" allocation for Ethereum Nick Johnson
2017-04-14 19:26 ` Tom Zander [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2112201.An0daUyfG4@cherry \
    --to=tomz@freedommail.ch \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox