From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C080C002D for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A1C833A8 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org C7A1C833A8 Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lightco.in header.i=@lightco.in header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=tK6i54Mw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=qf4m0ti7 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6fXnJfao3fo for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:10:30 by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org C1039833C9 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1039833C9 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DE7320093A; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:40:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap42 ([10.202.2.92]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:40:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lightco.in; h=cc :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1665589232; x=1665675632; bh=pb2LKrsQhX pc7WT2rWOmNYCMcsIisyQJ7E50z+rsdYU=; b=tK6i54Mw6vY+19DOsGz6T1b7LV o8pTw4JQrdms3o0fSy1rHlY+a56Hw1ga8SWp2vO4rHX0F3NOBIsU/n/CwH6sBRbR ZboZ+5hQBEstHC1plLeR3JcSIBatubu0XdOhcEYNox3g0NVUbawZ7ASZCGVELKsA m90Ne21DTiOJ9qatOH+e2S6vNwIYhI9S62sntg2RoOXWsqB5dPtEC1wTTvWYRXYw U4EquVDW8uhmbWqoneYxikwTWqI1Yc1p77FvbQtbBN/nEwfBygsqvCTiJ2/OIacx U5wtqpK+y2aYeyctfPvueNkZ97UIjxtOweeeTFQnwqyUmL+plltxscX1vDgw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1665589232; x=1665675632; bh=pb2LKrsQhXpc7WT2rWOmNYCMcsIi syQJ7E50z+rsdYU=; b=qf4m0ti7Kn/eCTkwA61ZMAvuFKaK/5iX1tYsNqDM6Xty 8sR5Z6EnY0WHK6NCu34Ue/BJcc2apBTaXGQXrIeG8EhJnjGppL1ksapl2y2op6GT CNWKCAFITPlCXG3lhTavTXrBeKQMCZiD8Ocb44hBUh4LZ/bv/rPfUa9t0/Ve8Lzq dNGQG5fatGZSYxWfZjcI53ZGTuKwbvvee78AfnM8Jtts5pIw9VLRsHzdhTSqvYJA NjB2t0TyRRuUzSGCKeqPy+zWaRWY+wmKiRH4r6a4Vw3YVinfpHjZEgsuz0NFnKgC D1mGHJEQXP+0PN/uDInv/MjpBtuPFtnbX1f8nXMT8A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeejkedgleefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflohhh nhcunfhighhhthdfuceosghithgtohhinhdquggvvheslhhighhhthgtohdrihhnqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvdfgvdeugfegtdeluefggfeuhfetffelvdfgiefgkeeutdeh hfefheevheehtdenucffohhmrghinhepthhrfeihrdhiohenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsihhttghoihhnqdguvghvsehlihhg hhhttghordhinh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ic4c14615:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E9387BC0078; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:40:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1047-g9e4af4ada4-fm-20221005.001-g9e4af4ad Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <224cf2f4-2577-4331-9977-ea71e9723ffe@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <689ed481-e7eb-4fea-8ca7-578503f3f285@app.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:40:10 -0400 From: "John Light" To: "Greg Sanders" , "Bitcoin Protocol Discussion" Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:51:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Validity Rollups on Bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:51:08 -0000 On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 9:28 AM, Greg Sanders wrote: > Is there a one page cheat sheet of "asks" for transaction > introspection/OP_ZKP(?) and their uses both separately and together for > different rollup architectures? We do not have this yet. Trey Del Bonis wrote a more detailed technical post about how those components would be used in a validity rollup, which was cited in my report and can be found here: https://tr3y.io/articles/crypto/bitcoin-zk-rollups.html But it'll take more research and design work to suss out those details you asked for and put them into a nice cheatsheet. I like this idea though!