From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6B6C002A for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9AB6164F for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org DA9AB6164F Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=thinlink-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com header.i=@thinlink-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=nh3X+460 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5x0afIjV-uc for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 7984060F5E Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7984060F5E for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-b9a6869dd3cso8436818276.2 for ; Tue, 09 May 2023 14:06:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thinlink-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683666362; x=1686258362; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:cc:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oRwDDPIQCqFPgZiW7CgsBTvM2P27d+qKyCzdPDUkvqY=; b=nh3X+460Rt/9kDRquOmznlRE0ctP/R6zAhH0ZlXyzC7NHXGie6Sf2+guHlZ0qHTwuy Z/yIHBvLUYnyGQBn4+qjUpkMdjTHP21GXz1RjzBojsiCxF75myJ3EfhzbJKQPfI5I7+e wlpBFuNhLdkrqUJucleqc8TOEsnTFTBVd8qC/gueidV+LQeRh1YhEcwgPPX2B7bJmbEB dEy4uxgwWeauBBcLFEwCiAuUk+ZRBuRodHJey3il9OCh4wkvNclsCCKsMX4nUXuhpJy9 vuxtDSprHuO1XXQsdAcnXFFoeERaWiEx7733PF6WuKSFyudO1R0CU5oV8unVMcWkB1me b0Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683666362; x=1686258362; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:cc:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oRwDDPIQCqFPgZiW7CgsBTvM2P27d+qKyCzdPDUkvqY=; b=Qi3troSw8NxbEcbFKo61UTwzWprSgXOAu2lwVXMaQYHQGpkSNl/QeCPLOVrWSrsmuK 7TsLncqjlnqMa4ImH7vm60cpG46bD3OGNVb7iYAHgYNIsK4p+9c8BGPuzcz82EUVWmNk cYMe64BwGDUhGj5RX+VU/UrFBb7XQ/BN+BgHHMye8l4H1RYLk5bXPhMTvFmcoFkGUbHG jwECelLhc4V5RJ74K8O+xNyKXpGsceL2Q0HQXhV0OMbbJsInVI0SOrmvO1hikPij51E9 ZWz9tf9/J6QCK4nM3NsBe/g1xcSo4JPYbM0d+/VLsFAk20GmOn40u8ZFAb4r67bHi8Xo Xfxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDywJyUTZDcCScLZ1Q2wAM1wG/smiJyGZkjFwD7ZymalczAQcIN8 9ovWBzzzO5wRdceIt3afpKEI0F5pjM6H8GCg2gY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ40tKtEjRtWeUtJixY16i9/tvKCuIdDOC/Y17pX+5e/ksIi1BoBiNSLvGWk6rClRYxw45mNCw== X-Received: by 2002:a25:aa45:0:b0:b9e:883f:6a27 with SMTP id s63-20020a25aa45000000b00b9e883f6a27mr15525598ybi.40.1683666362240; Tue, 09 May 2023 14:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:b950:d740:b1d9:f4cc:a7ea:2352? ([2600:1700:b950:d740:b1d9:f4cc:a7ea:2352]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 191-20020a2513c8000000b00b8f13ff2a8esm3263559ybt.61.2023.05.09.14.06.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 May 2023 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2360b8ad-ac13-f180-fc95-4d5804184dd8@thinlink.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 14:06:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Erik Aronesty References: <0aea4ec5-7d6a-f358-3c20-854001588031@dashjr.org> From: Tom Harding In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 May 2023 11:57:12 +0000 Cc: bitcoin-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 21:06:06 -0000 On 5/9/23 09:32, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote: > obviously it's easy enough to evade if every non-economic user simply > keeps enough bitcoin around and sends it back to himself > > so maybeit's a useless idea? but maybe that's enough of a hassle to stop > people (it certainly breaks ordinals, since it can never be 1 sat) Padding the change is not just a hassle, it requires holding extra BTC in a hot wallet, which has a cost. Spenders could also get around the rule by paying miners off-network, but having to do so would be an appropriate penalty for broadcasting a non-economic transaction.