From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Dustin Dettmer <dustinpaystaxes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proof-of-Stake Bitcoin Sidechains
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:16:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23C4B29C-0A0C-4680-BF99-3A86C215BE34@petertodd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8u0ExA_vvhRGzmFmxUoyqk6IBrnUEtEHAEMKzqLWLxC6IgBtvZR24jZBgeMeJlsPcjJKYgVar_rC388ZNjP09ZUkukfP1KRcL9NMDkrVrQM=@protonmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 604 bytes --]
On January 24, 2019 10:03:25 AM UTC, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>Good morning Dustin,
>
>> Wouldn’t a revealed private key for time locked funds create a race
>to spend? I imagine miners who are paying attention would have the
>advantage but it would still just be a race.
>
>If Bitcoin had implemented RBF "properly" (i.e. not have the silly
>"opt-out" rule) then such races are won by bidding up the fees. A
Note that CSV using transactions are always RBF as CSV disables the opt-out.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 500 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-25 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 22:59 [bitcoin-dev] Proof-of-Stake Bitcoin Sidechains Matt Bell
2019-01-19 1:42 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-01-19 5:35 ` Matt Bell
2019-01-20 2:06 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-01-21 18:47 ` Matt Bell
2019-01-22 9:19 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-01-22 14:58 ` Satoshin
2019-01-22 20:03 ` Dustin Dettmer
2019-01-22 16:33 ` Dustin Dettmer
2019-01-24 10:03 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-01-24 18:46 ` Matt Bell
2019-01-25 0:16 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2019-01-25 5:33 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-01-22 20:22 ` Dr Adam Back
2019-02-01 9:19 ` ZmnSCPxj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23C4B29C-0A0C-4680-BF99-3A86C215BE34@petertodd.org \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dustinpaystaxes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox