From: Hilda <hildawithin@163.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Is Bitcoin mempool synchronized?
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 03:01:30 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24cf6c3f.207.173069b0747.Coremail.hildawithin@163.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 367 bytes --]
Hi there,
I have been assuming Bitcoin system to be well synchronized, including mempools. But after being challenged, I started to think that I actually cannot verify this without knocking the door of every miner in every single second (just a time slice reasonable to me; stop torturing me by asking why). Can anyone share any thoughts with me?
Thank you,
Hilda
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 516 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 19:01 Hilda [this message]
2020-07-01 0:53 ` [bitcoin-dev] Is Bitcoin mempool synchronized? ZmnSCPxj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24cf6c3f.207.173069b0747.Coremail.hildawithin@163.com \
--to=hildawithin@163.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox