public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>,
	Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>,
	Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in Bitcoind?
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:22:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2691411.GaPfSIFZEE@crushinator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBgHZcdjRM+-UbSzuATBjj=yfBcqDMih+tAOYKBs=dLfWQ@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the quick reply to both of you, Mike and Pieter.

I feel foolish for posting to this list, because the debug.log does indeed say "inputs already spent." That's so weird, though, because we haven't been able to get anything to accept the transaction, seemingly, and yet it was accepted into the block chain 15 blocks ago.

Anyway, I'm sorry for the noise.


On Tuesday, 15 April 2014, at 5:11 pm, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> The first input seems to be already spent by another transaction
> (which looks very similar).
> 
> 0.9 should report a more detailed reason for rejection, by the way.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> > Check debug.log to find out the reason it was rejected.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bitcoin-development mailing list
> > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >



  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-15 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-15 15:00 [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in Bitcoind? Matt Whitlock
2014-04-15 15:05 ` Mike Hearn
2014-04-15 15:11   ` Pieter Wuille
2014-04-15 15:22     ` Matt Whitlock [this message]
2014-04-15 15:30       ` Mike Hearn
2014-04-15 15:42         ` Matt Whitlock
2014-04-15 15:47           ` Mike Belshe
2014-04-15 16:27             ` Matt Whitlock
2014-04-15 16:39               ` Chris Beams
2014-04-15 16:45                 ` Matt Whitlock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2691411.GaPfSIFZEE@crushinator \
    --to=bip@mattwhitlock.name \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mike@plan99.net \
    --cc=pieter.wuille@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox