From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14ADC002B for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C454041879 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:18:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org C454041879 Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=n2RQh50D X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-2-tTNVtKTB for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:18:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 4E65F41875 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E65F41875 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE935C0074; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 19:18:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 19:18:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675556287; x=1675642687; bh=L O44nTc+nekyBS9DBXJnyRo4wxn97olu5EZ8VE0zB3w=; b=n2RQh50DaTm0NCqNV UZ6nFNN6NMqF5DeYMD/v4Tl0caIa0YSebH7LX/ZnLccsNfzmES7grFj3Z/KQM6Yv eN0bW5fOCIIfXWRvZSZPuIEDYxzDL/8ZngwOTvSXkKZOz5wbkhvHHUkT7uuswNG2 rDP1ZDcKTZAUdsuGQeSl6t7tKWAfjtr7lEI6dzpb3bX6IPhywg+uqhn9B3E/c10W bsz2NP58Sm4toSzj6O3GLDyZYsXNI+mVu68LPddjycFeQdGaB1Yt3JelQviwIh3C FJAL2vlqcuy6t5OKecgS9W+zeTy+EguGoM0GdjEh2UxgD6FciFh/WBFQGTbIXOlE 6uNbg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudegfedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffufggjfhfkgggtgfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpefhteeuleffvddujeejteejjefgjeefleeiieejudeiiedvueegffefueeglefg ueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvg htvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 19:18:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 01:04:04 +0100 From: Peter Todd To: Aymeric Vitte , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev , Christopher Allen User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <230265ee-c3f8-dff3-9192-f0c8dc4d913c@peersm.com> References: <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com> <3d00aacb-585d-f875-784d-34352860d725@peersm.com> <230265ee-c3f8-dff3-9192-f0c8dc4d913c@peersm.com> Message-ID: <28C74556-8AB4-4E16-AC7D-7F3FAA0A29AC@petertodd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 00:18:13 -0000 On February 5, 2023 12:09:02 AM GMT+01:00, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev <= bitcoin-dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg> wrote: >I don't know, what number would you advise? When I made the >bitcoin-transactions nodejs module some years ago the limit (from the >specs) was 512B 1) Allowing only one OpReturn output causes problems trying to compose dif= ferent uses of OpReturn=2E We should allow any number of OpReturn outputs= =2E 2) There's no reason to put a size limit given all the other ways people c= an publish data, including with a 75% discount=2E Let the fee market deal w= ith it=2E