From: Michele Federici <michele@federici.tech>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Using the same public keys, the p2sh returned by `addmultisigaddress` differs from the one returned by `createmultisigaddress`
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:53:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <298ab7b97f0f34b6ef0e4b8345a942b3d77296d5.camel@federici.tech> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3228 bytes --]
Hi everyone,
I'm writing here because I didn't find any resources in the docs or
somewhere else online explaining this, I don't get if this is a bug or
I'm missing something.
I was working on a function to derive the pay-to-script-hash from a
multisig script and I was checking the results against the bitcoin
core's `addmultisigaddress` output, although I was quite sure that my
implementation was correct, my output address was different.
By chance, I then tried the `createmultisigaddress` method, using the
same public keys, and this time the output was matching with mine.
I thought the outputs of `addmultisigaddress` and
`createmultisigaddress` were supposed to be the same, but instead are
inconsistent from each other:
```
bitcoin-cli addmultisigaddress 1
'["045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c0c
e382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d","02ac46
c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831","0224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e07"]'
{
"address": "36ULucjWUTrDvaJzCyhFoVbDoNS6Zum2Du",
"redeemScript":
"5141045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c
0ce382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d2102ac4
6c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831210224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e0753ae"
}
```
```
bitcoin-cli createmultisig 1
'["045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c0c
e382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d","02ac46
c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831","0224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e07"]'
{
"address": "3GiimyxF1R5VixfBFAbQZbuy9EesD2r6n1",
"redeemScript":
"5141045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c
0ce382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d2102ac4
6c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831210224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e0753ae"
}
```
I was also pretty confused by the fact that the `redeemScript` is the
same, only the addresses are different, and calling `decodescript` with
it I get the same address as `createmultisig`:
```
bitcoin-cli decodescript
"5141045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c
0ce382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d2102ac4
6c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831210224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e0753ae"
{
"asm": "1
045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c0ce38
2458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d
02ac46c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831
0224a4dc5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e07 3
OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "multisig",
"addresses": [
"12PfkcWheYsfFddWfHhaXpFDVx78gnKQ9k",
"1AYLXzXd6N2avqW4j8Gyhb8jb2jXvNPyuV",
"1PWsxtcBMRHTSX2L7wrXgwnFigHD3KhbFT"
],
"p2sh": "3GiimyxF1R5VixfBFAbQZbuy9EesD2r6n1"
}
```
I don't understand, how can this be possible?
Thank you,
Michele
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-19 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-19 11:53 Michele Federici [this message]
2019-04-19 14:30 ` [bitcoin-dev] Using the same public keys, the p2sh returned by `addmultisigaddress` differs from the one returned by `createmultisigaddress` Andrew Chow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=298ab7b97f0f34b6ef0e4b8345a942b3d77296d5.camel@federici.tech \
--to=michele@federici.tech \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox