From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
To: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Libbitcoin Development <libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:20:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31FB94D1-5B5B-43EF-AFD8-2A7508464F7C@jonasschnelli.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <beed7ade-13be-3a7f-9a4e-99f77378e780@voskuil.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1078 bytes --]
> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>:
>
> On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote:
>>>> Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way
>>>
>>> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ...
>>> guarantee node ownership“).
>>
>> Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD.
>
> I'm always willing to debate this issue. I'm generally a little
> suspicious of one who demands another person to stop arguing. I got at
> least one such demand (along with a threat) on this subject privately
> last summer from a notable Core dev. There is a lengthy thread on this
> subject in which I raised these issues. Everyone is free to review that
> discussion.
What you did say in the sentence above (and I think is FUD) is, that BIP150 will lead to every node being identifiable. This is just completely wrong.
There is nothing to say against a technical debate (and we had this), but I will ask you to stop if I see you attacking BIP150/151 at every occasion with FUDish arguments like this.
</jonas>
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-04 16:04 [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers John Hardy
2017-03-05 6:29 ` Marcel Jamin
2017-03-05 12:55 ` John Hardy
2017-03-05 13:27 ` Btc Drak
2017-03-05 13:57 ` John Hardy
2017-03-07 18:44 ` Eric Voskuil
2017-03-08 2:01 ` bfd
2017-03-08 19:47 ` Jonas Schnelli
2017-03-08 21:09 ` Eric Voskuil
2017-03-08 21:20 ` Jonas Schnelli [this message]
2017-03-08 23:12 ` Pieter Wuille
[not found] ` <6a5a6a8f-d689-260a-76a9-a91f6bda56c5@voskuil.org>
2017-03-09 1:55 ` Pieter Wuille
2017-03-09 11:01 ` Aymeric Vitte
2017-03-09 1:08 ` Eric Voskuil
2017-03-08 21:25 ` [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers (and BIP150) Tom Zander
2017-03-08 21:31 ` Jonas Schnelli
[not found] <7c5020dd-5259-9954-7bf1-06fa98124f8f@voskuil.org>
2017-03-22 0:04 ` [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers Eric Voskuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31FB94D1-5B5B-43EF-AFD8-2A7508464F7C@jonasschnelli.ch \
--to=dev@jonasschnelli.ch \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eric@voskuil.org \
--cc=libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox