From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YBZJa-0000eO-7q for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:33:38 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.43]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YBZJZ-0004WV-3R for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:33:38 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.102]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id g1Ke1p0042D5gil011L25l; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:20:02 +0000 Received: from crushinator.localnet ([IPv6:2601:6:4800:47f:1e4e:1f4d:332c:3bf6]) by resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id g1L11p00F2JF60R011L1U2; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:20:02 +0000 From: Matt Whitlock To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:17:52 -0500 Message-ID: <3382316.6TbFyFjyI6@crushinator> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [69.252.207.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YBZJZ-0004WV-3R Cc: Ruben de Vries , Jeffrey Paul Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public keys for p2sh multisig transactions X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:33:38 -0000 On Wednesday, 14 January 2015, at 3:53 pm, Eric Lombrozo wrote: > Internally, pubkeys are DER-encoded integers. I thought pubkeys were represented as raw integers (i.e., they're embedded in Script as a push operation whose payload is the raw bytes of the big-endian representation of the integer). As far as I know, DER encoding is only used for signatures. Am I mistaken?