public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
@ 2015-09-18  1:07 Wladimir J. van der Laan
  2015-09-18  2:56 ` Alex Morcos
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Wladimir J. van der Laan @ 2015-09-18  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin development mailing list; +Cc: Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

Hello,

At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.

Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.

Any preference for days/times?

What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?

Wladimir


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  1:07 [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC Wladimir J. van der Laan
@ 2015-09-18  2:56 ` Alex Morcos
  2015-09-18  4:19   ` Peter Todd
  2015-09-18  4:30 ` Mark Friedenbach
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Alex Morcos @ 2015-09-18  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wladimir J. van der Laan
  Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

+1
sounds good to me!



On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer
> meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
>
> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that
> many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.
>
> Any preference for days/times?
>
> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
>
> Wladimir
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1279 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  2:56 ` Alex Morcos
@ 2015-09-18  4:19   ` Peter Todd
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Peter Todd @ 2015-09-18  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Morcos, Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev, Wladimir J. van der Laan
  Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On 17 September 2015 19:56:17 GMT-07:00, Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>+1
>sounds good to me!

+2

My schedule is chaotic, but I'll try to attend.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV+5Cr
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MH/Rx7HDZ0eob6PWnA9zB0He2AvhJwhWsgfGZvj8C1CCHS
Q8JmtcVmaq8fcNFLIb3r/aN/cZxKiY/9pbceHe2/l8cYDH6VUsLUear/bjDOaBL5
h76jIswFcr54ifjrwXIvHC98x9NeezcbvkFNOgxRWrgFO28saxgq78lOHp8g5mZ9
sL6/nBLqadCH59c5ieJHATyb8nR2qSZRj3fGUuuI9nQnQMkmSEV09URNr7LBgRAE
suR09jsLXrHcME7XAryw9pl6w/Fuh+Ygcpij8eLsf+uLvr/vzkBPpthr0h9jg3Np
Jtm0mpgMsNg+p2koQbhHWYa5E+dzIEXoVURFm0y+H5Y=
=/ZFP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  1:07 [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC Wladimir J. van der Laan
  2015-09-18  2:56 ` Alex Morcos
@ 2015-09-18  4:30 ` Mark Friedenbach
  2015-09-18  4:57 ` Luke Dashjr
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Mark Friedenbach @ 2015-09-18  4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wladimir J. van der Laan
  Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]

I am unlikely to attend at that time, but there is no time that will fit
everybody's schedules. I approve of the idea and look forward to reading
the logs.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer
> meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
>
> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that
> many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.
>
> Any preference for days/times?
>
> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
>
> Wladimir
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1379 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  1:07 [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC Wladimir J. van der Laan
  2015-09-18  2:56 ` Alex Morcos
  2015-09-18  4:30 ` Mark Friedenbach
@ 2015-09-18  4:57 ` Luke Dashjr
  2015-09-18  7:04   ` Jonas Schnelli
  2015-09-18 20:14 ` Matt Corallo
  2015-09-21 13:29 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Luke Dashjr @ 2015-09-18  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bitcoin-dev, Wladimir J. van der Laan; +Cc: Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

On Friday, September 18, 2015 1:07:10 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan via 
bitcoin-dev wrote:
> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer
> meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
> 
> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that
> many people are expected to be present and current issues can be
> discussed.

I think it's important to make a point that these meetings are for 
discussions, and explicitly never decisions, to avoid a repeat of the P2SH 
events when people have to miss it.

> Any preference for days/times?
> 
> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?

I think I would prefer a bit later, but I could probably make this work. 
Probably should try to make it more practical for California devs though, 
since there are a number of them.

Luke


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  4:57 ` Luke Dashjr
@ 2015-09-18  7:04   ` Jonas Schnelli
  2015-09-18  8:20     ` Eric Lombrozo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Jonas Schnelli @ 2015-09-18  7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bitcoin-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> On Friday, September 18, 2015 1:07:10 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan
> via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular
>> developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
>> 
>> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a
>> time that many people are expected to be present and current
>> issues can be discussed.
> 
> I think it's important to make a point that these meetings are for
>  discussions, and explicitly never decisions, to avoid a repeat of
> the P2SH events when people have to miss it.
> 
>> Any preference for days/times?
>> 
>> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?

+1 for the weekly IRC meetings.

For time and date maybe a Doodle could help:
http://doodle.com/poll/cihug53sa8u4h2in#table


- ---
jonas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+7eaAAoJECnUvLZBb1PsESgQAIQnHDe7owv3OzMvxwupzGaD
IkTsRtCTSntIb75Wb/KYc0y1L3ilSENRTfZ4nNc4QquqTstkhjU5t+u9T3Mak4D3
2/5AOiJhV6OLYav1SC7uSJh0B4halnZlTwclU7NOvmnkg40DUpNxmEbf+RvUZup3
J0EQFxIuhtjIz0HfZTvw6wmstrP3+UJZTbM5fg0FO3TpgmGybAUoQ3eWgRa7v/gR
OUxnAV//Mus2O80/Z+c5KycZ1Dqc/iN7cQsQFt7kEIK0epkJhkTjoRrW9MyQW04d
1jv7d0mjEJt+2EiC8UuwpaW2eFmeFnGR0pL4UCY1QsDzGENyHKNbrVg26v1AzIbB
SNEYN1+fmsXQYosY5t0Z887Ij+u4/GLHciimh5z7fbI5VB1Ng6Wl84maVmP5Zb3L
MHtkIqQ00RX7GIXUp5+u7eKOO0pH9S08tqo5Ag6ceynJ2lh4Wr8BCNghHzH+ybNJ
NG3BaSkQmjxnWjW3XplaYyxz6E4qJ8id7qH4s0iaNKchAfXiCaBtbcMfljlyBSn/
UbzHJk5jlWZEVpxmiMRctFxusk6GI4P+0eRTJrkffskLEjImUN93A8hOLs5Dy+gI
mm/PZKT2S2qKKa6dlI2kpyPZuRbN7+WSi/FwI0YsUDGl+IoDSqTX7WqRY8cY40ji
rUgzYTw3Won3BcjHTe9y
=JsXj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  7:04   ` Jonas Schnelli
@ 2015-09-18  8:20     ` Eric Lombrozo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Eric Lombrozo @ 2015-09-18  8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonas Schnelli, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev, bitcoin-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2280 bytes --]

I love the weekly meeting idea...but timezones might be an issue.

My general preference would be afternoons to late evenings pacific time, but that translates to late night/early morning for those in europe.

On September 18, 2015 12:04:58 AM PDT, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA256
>
>> On Friday, September 18, 2015 1:07:10 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan
>> via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular
>>> developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
>>> 
>>> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a
>>> time that many people are expected to be present and current
>>> issues can be discussed.
>> 
>> I think it's important to make a point that these meetings are for
>>  discussions, and explicitly never decisions, to avoid a repeat of
>> the P2SH events when people have to miss it.
>> 
>>> Any preference for days/times?
>>> 
>>> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
>
>+1 for the weekly IRC meetings.
>
>For time and date maybe a Doodle could help:
>http://doodle.com/poll/cihug53sa8u4h2in#table
>
>
>- ---
>jonas
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v2
>
>iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+7eaAAoJECnUvLZBb1PsESgQAIQnHDe7owv3OzMvxwupzGaD
>IkTsRtCTSntIb75Wb/KYc0y1L3ilSENRTfZ4nNc4QquqTstkhjU5t+u9T3Mak4D3
>2/5AOiJhV6OLYav1SC7uSJh0B4halnZlTwclU7NOvmnkg40DUpNxmEbf+RvUZup3
>J0EQFxIuhtjIz0HfZTvw6wmstrP3+UJZTbM5fg0FO3TpgmGybAUoQ3eWgRa7v/gR
>OUxnAV//Mus2O80/Z+c5KycZ1Dqc/iN7cQsQFt7kEIK0epkJhkTjoRrW9MyQW04d
>1jv7d0mjEJt+2EiC8UuwpaW2eFmeFnGR0pL4UCY1QsDzGENyHKNbrVg26v1AzIbB
>SNEYN1+fmsXQYosY5t0Z887Ij+u4/GLHciimh5z7fbI5VB1Ng6Wl84maVmP5Zb3L
>MHtkIqQ00RX7GIXUp5+u7eKOO0pH9S08tqo5Ag6ceynJ2lh4Wr8BCNghHzH+ybNJ
>NG3BaSkQmjxnWjW3XplaYyxz6E4qJ8id7qH4s0iaNKchAfXiCaBtbcMfljlyBSn/
>UbzHJk5jlWZEVpxmiMRctFxusk6GI4P+0eRTJrkffskLEjImUN93A8hOLs5Dy+gI
>mm/PZKT2S2qKKa6dlI2kpyPZuRbN7+WSi/FwI0YsUDGl+IoDSqTX7WqRY8cY40ji
>rUgzYTw3Won3BcjHTe9y
>=JsXj
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3208 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  1:07 [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC Wladimir J. van der Laan
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-18  4:57 ` Luke Dashjr
@ 2015-09-18 20:14 ` Matt Corallo
  2015-09-18 20:24   ` Btc Drak
  2015-09-21 13:29 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Matt Corallo @ 2015-09-18 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wladimir J. van der Laan, Bitcoin development mailing list
  Cc: Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

Generally in favor, but for practical purposes can we select a timezone
that is available in Google Calendar? It appears it does not directly
support UTC...

On 09/18/15 01:07, Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
> 
> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.
> 
> Any preference for days/times?
> 
> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
> 
> Wladimir
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:14 ` Matt Corallo
@ 2015-09-18 20:24   ` Btc Drak
  2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
                       ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Btc Drak @ 2015-09-18 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matt Corallo; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1529 bytes --]

Google calendar is localised, so it doesn't matter. The problem with
quoting UTC anyway it the meeting times are going to change for those that
observe DST. It would be much better to quote an actual timezone of an
actual area so it will remain constant, like 1700 CEST, or 0900AM PDT for
example. Otherwise when the clocks change, what was a convenient meeting
time will become inconvenient for some.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Generally in favor, but for practical purposes can we select a timezone
> that is available in Google Calendar? It appears it does not directly
> support UTC...
>
> On 09/18/15 01:07, Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular
> developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
> >
> > Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time
> that many people are expected to be present and current issues can be
> discussed.
> >
> > Any preference for days/times?
> >
> > What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
> >
> > Wladimir
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2350 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:24   ` Btc Drak
@ 2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
  2015-09-18 20:30       ` Jeffrey Paul
  2015-09-18 20:31       ` Gregory Maxwell
  2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
  2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Matt Corallo @ 2015-09-18 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Btc Drak; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the timezone
of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we should
use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as everyone else
- CEST/PDT/EST/etc.

On 09/18/15 20:24, Btc Drak wrote:
> Google calendar is localised, so it doesn't matter. The problem with
> quoting UTC anyway it the meeting times are going to change for those
> that observe DST. It would be much better to quote an actual timezone of
> an actual area so it will remain constant, like 1700 CEST, or 0900AM PDT
> for example. Otherwise when the clocks change, what was a convenient
> meeting time will become inconvenient for some.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Generally in favor, but for practical purposes can we select a timezone
>     that is available in Google Calendar? It appears it does not directly
>     support UTC...
> 
>     On 09/18/15 01:07, Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     >
>     > At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular
>     developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
>     >
>     > Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a
>     time that many people are expected to be present and current issues
>     can be discussed.
>     >
>     > Any preference for days/times?
>     >
>     > What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
>     >
>     > Wladimir
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > bitcoin-dev mailing list
>     > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>     <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>     > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     bitcoin-dev mailing list
>     bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>     <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>     https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
@ 2015-09-18 20:30       ` Jeffrey Paul
  2015-09-18 20:34         ` Matt Corallo
  2015-09-18 20:31       ` Gregory Maxwell
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Paul @ 2015-09-18 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matt Corallo; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille


> On 18 Sep 2015, at 22:27, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the timezone
> of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we should
> use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as everyone else
> - CEST/PDT/EST/etc.

According to this post, it is possible to configure Google Calendar to show an additional time zone to your localized one, and GMT/UTC is indeed in the list.

    https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/calendar/y6uaiAdZrIg

-jp

--
Jeffrey Paul                                                      EEQJ
jp@eeqj.com                                           https://eeqj.com
+1-800-403-1126 (America)                  +1-312-361-0355 (Worldwide)
5539 AD00 DE4C 42F3 AFE1                      1575 0524 43F4 DF2A 55C2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
  2015-09-18 20:30       ` Jeffrey Paul
@ 2015-09-18 20:31       ` Gregory Maxwell
  2015-09-18 20:34         ` Btc Drak
  2015-09-18 20:36         ` Matt Corallo
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Maxwell @ 2015-09-18 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matt Corallo; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the timezone
> of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we should
> use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as everyone else
> - CEST/PDT/EST/etc.

uh. There is fairly little global consistency in DST usage. Lots of
places do dst on different dates.

So if it's in some DST timezone it's likely to move twice each change
for some subset of the people who do it.

E.g. europe and US end DST one week apart.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:30       ` Jeffrey Paul
@ 2015-09-18 20:34         ` Matt Corallo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Matt Corallo @ 2015-09-18 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeffrey Paul; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille

I believe that is out of date. I see neither UTC nor GMT on the website nor on Android.

Matt

On September 18, 2015 4:30:23 PM EDT, Jeffrey Paul <jp@eeqj.com> wrote:
>
>> On 18 Sep 2015, at 22:27, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
><bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the
>timezone
>> of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we
>should
>> use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as everyone
>else
>> - CEST/PDT/EST/etc.
>
>According to this post, it is possible to configure Google Calendar to
>show an additional time zone to your localized one, and GMT/UTC is
>indeed in the list.
>
>    https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/calendar/y6uaiAdZrIg
>
>-jp
>
>--
>Jeffrey Paul                                                      EEQJ
>jp@eeqj.com                                           https://eeqj.com
>+1-800-403-1126 (America)                  +1-312-361-0355 (Worldwide)
>5539 AD00 DE4C 42F3 AFE1                      1575 0524 43F4 DF2A 55C2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:31       ` Gregory Maxwell
@ 2015-09-18 20:34         ` Btc Drak
  2015-09-21 13:01           ` jl2012
  2015-09-18 20:36         ` Matt Corallo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Btc Drak @ 2015-09-18 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gregory Maxwell
  Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 786 bytes --]

Urgh... Can we hardfork time? It's clearly in need of an upgrade...

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the timezone
> > of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we should
> > use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as everyone else
> > - CEST/PDT/EST/etc.
>
> uh. There is fairly little global consistency in DST usage. Lots of
> places do dst on different dates.
>
> So if it's in some DST timezone it's likely to move twice each change
> for some subset of the people who do it.
>
> E.g. europe and US end DST one week apart.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1233 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:31       ` Gregory Maxwell
  2015-09-18 20:34         ` Btc Drak
@ 2015-09-18 20:36         ` Matt Corallo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Matt Corallo @ 2015-09-18 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gregory Maxwell
  Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille

Yes, I'm aware, however they are closer to each other than UTC is to either :p.

On September 18, 2015 4:31:28 PM EDT, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
><bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the
>timezone
>> of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we
>should
>> use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as everyone
>else
>> - CEST/PDT/EST/etc.
>
>uh. There is fairly little global consistency in DST usage. Lots of
>places do dst on different dates.
>
>So if it's in some DST timezone it's likely to move twice each change
>for some subset of the people who do it.
>
>E.g. europe and US end DST one week apart.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:24   ` Btc Drak
  2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
@ 2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
  2015-09-18 23:29       ` Dave Scotese
  2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Luke Dashjr @ 2015-09-18 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bitcoin-dev, Btc Drak; +Cc: Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille

On Friday, September 18, 2015 8:24:50 PM Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Google calendar is localised, so it doesn't matter. The problem with
> quoting UTC anyway it the meeting times are going to change for those that
> observe DST. It would be much better to quote an actual timezone of an
> actual area so it will remain constant, like 1700 CEST, or 0900AM PDT for
> example. Otherwise when the clocks change, what was a convenient meeting
> time will become inconvenient for some.

Not everyone does crazy clock-changing. Using such a time system for 
scheduling seems to inconvenience the wrong position. (although perhaps 
arguably better since most people probably use DST) :p

(Aside, if Google Calendar can't support standard UTC, that sounds like an 
argument against using Google Calendar...)

> Urgh... Can we hardfork time? It's clearly in need of an upgrade...

Tonal time works nice any consistently. :D

Luke


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:24   ` Btc Drak
  2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
  2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
@ 2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Luke Dashjr @ 2015-09-18 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bitcoin-dev, Btc Drak; +Cc: Cory Fields, Pieter Wuille

On Friday, September 18, 2015 8:24:50 PM Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Google calendar is localised, so it doesn't matter. The problem with
> quoting UTC anyway it the meeting times are going to change for those that
> observe DST. It would be much better to quote an actual timezone of an
> actual area so it will remain constant, like 1700 CEST, or 0900AM PDT for
> example. Otherwise when the clocks change, what was a convenient meeting
> time will become inconvenient for some.

Not everyone does crazy clock-changing. Using such a time system for 
scheduling seems to inconvenience the wrong position. (although perhaps 
arguably better since most people probably use DST) :p

(Aside, if Google Calendar can't support standard UTC, that sounds like an 
argument against using Google Calendar...)

> Urgh... Can we hardfork time? It's clearly in need of an upgrade...

Tonal time works nice and consistently. :D

Luke


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
@ 2015-09-18 23:29       ` Dave Scotese
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Dave Scotese @ 2015-09-18 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luke Dashjr; +Cc: Bitcoin Dev, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1931 bytes --]

I am in a timezone that uses DST (currently PDT), but I would like us to
use a timezone that does NOT use DST.  It will be nice to have something
that reflects the seasonal patterns like my own body does.  I hate the time
change in both ways.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Friday, September 18, 2015 8:24:50 PM Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Google calendar is localised, so it doesn't matter. The problem with
> > quoting UTC anyway it the meeting times are going to change for those
> that
> > observe DST. It would be much better to quote an actual timezone of an
> > actual area so it will remain constant, like 1700 CEST, or 0900AM PDT for
> > example. Otherwise when the clocks change, what was a convenient meeting
> > time will become inconvenient for some.
>
> Not everyone does crazy clock-changing. Using such a time system for
> scheduling seems to inconvenience the wrong position. (although perhaps
> arguably better since most people probably use DST) :p
>
> (Aside, if Google Calendar can't support standard UTC, that sounds like an
> argument against using Google Calendar...)
>
> > Urgh... Can we hardfork time? It's clearly in need of an upgrade...
>
> Tonal time works nice any consistently. :D
>
> Luke
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>



-- 
I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a
techie?
I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com> and Meme Racing
<http://www.memeracing.net> (in alpha).
I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com> which
now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>.
"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi
Nakamoto

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2856 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18 20:34         ` Btc Drak
@ 2015-09-21 13:01           ` jl2012
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jl2012 @ 2015-09-21 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Btc Drak; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

It is possible to softfork. Just use Iceland time. Iceland time = UTC 
without DST

Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-09-18 16:34 寫到:
> Urgh... Can we hardfork time? It's clearly in need of an upgrade...
> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
>> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> Google Calendar is localized, but has an option to change the
>> timezone
>>> of an event, it just doesnt have UTC in its options. So, yes, we
>> should
>>> use something that observes DST in roughly the same way as
>> everyone else
>>> - CEST/PDT/EST/etc.
>> 
>> uh. There is fairly little global consistency in DST usage. Lots of
>> places do dst on different dates.
>> 
>> So if it's in some DST timezone it's likely to move twice each
>> change
>> for some subset of the people who do it.
>> 
>> E.g. europe and US end DST one week apart.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-18  1:07 [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC Wladimir J. van der Laan
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-18 20:14 ` Matt Corallo
@ 2015-09-21 13:29 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
  2015-09-21 13:51   ` gb
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Wladimir J. van der Laan @ 2015-09-21 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin development mailing list; +Cc: Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:07:10AM +0200, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
> 
> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.
> 
> Any preference for days/times?
> 
> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?

From Jonasschnelli's doodle ( http://doodle.com/poll/cihug53sa8u4h2in#table ) it appears that Thursday 19:00 UTC - 20:00 UTC is the most popular time.

I think scheduling the meeting in UTC (=Iceland time) makes sense internationally because different locales have different DST or no DST at all, so all in all that makes it more complex. It's true that this can make a convenient time less convenient half of the year, for some people, but I don't think there's a time that works for everyone anyway...

Wladimir


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-21 13:29 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
@ 2015-09-21 13:51   ` gb
  2015-09-22 14:03     ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: gb @ 2015-09-21 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wladimir J. van der Laan
  Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list, Pieter Wuille, Cory Fields


Although the planning for this a bit far along now, one consideration I
might add from experience on working with other transglobal IT projects
is the effect of timezones on local mood/alertness/awareness etc. The
guys at 9am pinging on their first coffee in the antipodes will be in a
different mindset than those at 21:00 in Europe, and this is
unavoidable. What is possible is to schedule the meeting every other
week at a time that is better for the "other" half, whoever that might
be. This comes at the cost of not having an exactly same time set every
week.

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 15:29 +0200, Wladimir J. van der Laan via
bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:07:10AM +0200, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
> > 
> > Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.
> > 
> > Any preference for days/times?
> > 
> > What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
> 
> From Jonasschnelli's doodle ( http://doodle.com/poll/cihug53sa8u4h2in#table ) it appears that Thursday 19:00 UTC - 20:00 UTC is the most popular time.
> 
> I think scheduling the meeting in UTC (=Iceland time) makes sense internationally because different locales have different DST or no DST at all, so all in all that makes it more complex. It's true that this can make a convenient time less convenient half of the year, for some people, but I don't think there's a time that works for everyone anyway...
> 
> Wladimir
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
  2015-09-21 13:51   ` gb
@ 2015-09-22 14:03     ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Wladimir J. van der Laan @ 2015-09-22 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gb; +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:51:29PM +0200, gb wrote:
> 
> Although the planning for this a bit far along now, one consideration I
> might add from experience on working with other transglobal IT projects

Nah, we can always change the scheduling later... But let's first try it out with one time.

W


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-22 14:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-18  1:07 [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC Wladimir J. van der Laan
2015-09-18  2:56 ` Alex Morcos
2015-09-18  4:19   ` Peter Todd
2015-09-18  4:30 ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-09-18  4:57 ` Luke Dashjr
2015-09-18  7:04   ` Jonas Schnelli
2015-09-18  8:20     ` Eric Lombrozo
2015-09-18 20:14 ` Matt Corallo
2015-09-18 20:24   ` Btc Drak
2015-09-18 20:27     ` Matt Corallo
2015-09-18 20:30       ` Jeffrey Paul
2015-09-18 20:34         ` Matt Corallo
2015-09-18 20:31       ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-09-18 20:34         ` Btc Drak
2015-09-21 13:01           ` jl2012
2015-09-18 20:36         ` Matt Corallo
2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
2015-09-18 23:29       ` Dave Scotese
2015-09-18 21:50     ` Luke Dashjr
2015-09-21 13:29 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2015-09-21 13:51   ` gb
2015-09-22 14:03     ` Wladimir J. van der Laan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox