From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>, Richard Moore <me@ricmoo.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 65 and OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY inquiry...
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:18:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A394B8C-FD24-4134-A8B8-CCAF63ECB5B0@petertodd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSr7-s-Bg-6Fjs1=dg0WR4JZfWbx2hnSyU4iXRNKHma4Q@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 27 November 2014 18:46:23 GMT-05:00, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip 100% accurate commentary from gmaxwell>
>The things you're suggesting were all carefully designed out of the
>proposal, perhaps the BIP text needs some more clarification to make
>this more clear.
It does; it is still a draft. That said I think writing up some actual working examples, in code, of CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY using protocols is a bigger priority. Micropayment channels comes to mind, as well as a greenaddress-style wallet.
When I get a chance I'm going to rebase the initial implementation and add to it a command-line-flag to verify CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY as an IsStandard() rule for testing purposes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJUd+luMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhWmcB/0UK030Q6TSpi95x0Gh
hGYaSAInUWpbZzZtP+1AFrGDGRdGo0glFFf8xggI+U5kuc0woPYrn/VEGcprPhvs
KQFZrirXVr7Q09TVlHiPDen5v3Y7xwL5kQDUrBPP71Pe3R2o6IbfdwxsZ8+yYso8
hY6WQmImQpKJd4gEd76w1QrF8Btl1Jz/PGh4EE3GSPGlflvBwA6igSiRoD/czb1x
63y4AsPEil2hrmIjTZHqwnl40BqnmZ8qpNLWeIEjE++pbkxLTjvUcPy03/wtTWZA
5dCGeY5WavgZsPazhSdaTtM5/7wPSQQ0PDXNHdHgmewkvbyBpy78orV/3bEG+xFz
2SWi
=4OmI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-28 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 22:56 [Bitcoin-development] BIP 65 and OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY inquiry Richard Moore
2014-11-27 23:46 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-11-28 3:18 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2014-11-28 11:45 ` Flavien Charlon
2014-11-28 12:03 ` Gregory Maxwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A394B8C-FD24-4134-A8B8-CCAF63ECB5B0@petertodd.org \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gmaxwell@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ricmoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox