On Jun 1, 2015, at 8:42 PM, Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com> wrote:

On 6/1/2015 10:21 AM, Adam Back wrote:

if it stays as is for a year, in a wait and see, reduce spam, see
fee-pressure take effect as it has before, work on improving improve
decentralisation metrics, relay latency, and do a blocksize increment
to kick the can if-and-when it becomes necessary and in the mean-time
try to do something more long-term ambitious about scale rather than
volume.

What's your estimate of the lead time required to kick the can,
if-and-when it becomes necessary?

The other time-series I've seen all plot an average block size.  That's
misleading, because there's a distribution of block sizes.  If you bin
by retarget interval and plot every single block, you get this

http://i.imgur.com/5Gfh9CW.png

The max block size has clearly been in play for 8 months already.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development