From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8676747E for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:42:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from pmx.vmail.no (pmx.vmail.no [193.75.16.11]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30537171 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmx.vmail.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with SMTP id 466D8404AC for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:42:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28]) by pmx.vmail.no (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id 12F154049A for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:42:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from coldstorage.localnet (unknown [81.191.185.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AE2C2 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:42:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Zander To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:42:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4330019.CpFTjXpmfm@coldstorage> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1689926.ZjkxyJjokn@coldstorage> References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com> <1689926.ZjkxyJjokn@coldstorage> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn'ttemporary X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:42:56 -0000 On Thursday 30. July 2015 18.07.40 Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Remember when we went from single-core CPUs to multi-core (and > hyperthreading)? Developers were saying it was useless because all apps > were still single-threaded. And now, 15 years later, there are fantastic > frameworks to make this easy. > > Same will happen with distributed. Any assumption you wrote above is not > inherent in the technology. My brain went a bit to fast (dinner was being served, she made me close the laptop...) and wrote distributed above while the topic is decentralized. Its not entirely wrong, even; Libraries or approaches that do distributed will be useful for decentralized systems. ;) -- Thomas Zander