From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <santino.napolitano@yandex.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CFE1361
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:09:58 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from forward14j.cmail.yandex.net (forward14j.cmail.yandex.net
	[5.255.227.178])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33031F9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:19:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from web3j.yandex.ru (web3j.yandex.ru [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::303])
	by forward14j.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4747D213C5;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:09:10 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by web3j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 709FA70803C6;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:09:09 +0300 (MSK)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail;
	t=1443539349; bh=wQBeYQOtDAsfo/tHBUyqs9/Xr+rszuaQQJYt3nGZAK8=;
	h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date;
	b=VTpPYfHMC6vSA52jJa3rFAlvcWFj6dzceCWM+nNaSb9TwObTCpNtXkqZbrxkucN6K
	au6S2xS13sLMgSjFHQLFcsGasikIgZ8XZFGPgvX3q2+sq2X01USMc57Jm4qZyG/Hgy
	RNrXgt0mcmz3A6N9GFp2L01UnxOfA6s+gBhB/uPM=
Received: by web3j.yandex.ru with HTTP;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:09:05 +0300
From: Santino Napolitano <santino.napolitano@yandex.com>
Envelope-From: santino-napolitano@yandex.com
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>,
	=?utf-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKSTC_4Ugpvcb88QxusyBixmzXaTckq0Fx5v3NpgBzjMwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928132127.GA4829@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKTCZDNVJ-XEmsCAWGXUV3xOzVYmqMQYm0x+ihyYWQN0Gg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928142953.GC21815@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKTUz2eVJOpixSebWiQ59ovoELNhsZWSsbLHXWqk2eCn0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928144318.GA28939@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKSuO2v+92hJUckcYdHcjkPVNg4opDL98yygGp-gqB9Jtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928150543.GB28939@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKTPKxGWWN28_hzR8BoCh11exvgZm4s-_=5oFWd-R62uyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8461c6195ca65ce7355f693fa24bb177@xbt.hk>
	<CA+w+GKRcUYsKzG8n5ut-ObD1MM9bs0OD-jdHe1+cLkcO6B7wKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrcrtZLQE8Q9ZuxsWEfD_mFhdBz36x3RCPrQtbBi1455A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+w+GKSTC_4Ugpvcb88QxusyBixmzXaTckq0Fx5v3NpgBzjMwg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <483271443539345@web3j.yandex.ru>
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:09:05 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,PLING_QUERY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Why soft-forks? was: Let's deploy BIP65
	CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:19:13 -0000

> So I'll repeat the question that I posed before - given that there are clear, explicit downsides,
> what is the purpose of doing things this way? Where is the gain for ordinary Bitcoin users?

+1 for a direct answer to this question.