From: Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Deprecating "midstate" in getwork?
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:48:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E845B09.8040400@justmoon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E845935.8060601@nilsschneider.net>
BitcoinJS uses OpenSSL to calculate midstate:
https://github.com/bitcoinjs/node-bitcoin-p2p/blob/master/native.cc#L380
On 9/29/2011 1:40 PM, Nils Schneider wrote:
> Yes, that's possible and what
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/535 does. However, deprecating
> midstate (and hash1) would allow for much cleaner code.
>
> A pull request for marking midstate (and hash1) as deprecated can be
> found at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/538
>
> On 29.09.2011 12:23, John Smith wrote:
>> Nils,
>>
>> Sounds good. I'm also doubtful of depending on two crypto libraries when
>> OpenSSL does perfectly well.
>>
>> However, losing compatibility with miners is not very nice. Is there
>> really not a way to compute midstate with OpenSSL?
>>
>> JS
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Nils Schneider<nils@nilsschneider.net
>> <mailto:nils@nilsschneider.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I'd like to simplify the internal reference miner and remove all
>> dependencies on cryptopp (it's the only place we use cryptopp instead of
>> OpenSSL).
>>
>> Unfortunately, cryptopp is also used to calculate getwork "midstate".
>> This field is redundant and the miner could easily calculate it from the
>> blockheader so I'd like to remove it.
>>
>> Any thoughts? Where should such a change should be announced so all
>> miners can be upgraded?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
>> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
>> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
>> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> <mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-26 19:42 [Bitcoin-development] Deprecating "midstate" in getwork? Nils Schneider
2011-09-28 3:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-09-28 3:54 ` Luke-Jr
2011-09-29 10:23 ` John Smith
2011-09-29 11:40 ` Nils Schneider
2011-09-29 11:48 ` Stefan Thomas [this message]
2011-09-29 12:49 ` solar
2011-10-02 7:52 ` John Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E845B09.8040400@justmoon.de \
--to=moon@justmoon.de \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox