From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D9D21E26 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 09:18:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EFE8826 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 09:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id y4so5301749wrm.2 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ySeRgeePeIOky4PKyyHsMdElVwJDEyFyAGMLx2YDEEc=; b=deWI50l5velvzpyuaEMyrk2F4ewb0NJm37PXDyOSBdmKfVIC6sZgT9LKI9QXDseoVu QvYAtRoYKErxHheFk6HZbQLPEozkRE3WMtRTG2U9vByQgFoVvD5ZY38Ita1gPIA9+S4Y gMCb1ZC9gMEp9jXRpLkG8bE/syVBr5pCaqqXOW+T7js1PFqo2s+jhJYwV60nTCYsC1al z2JyNkHf56pazJHm5B8MgPGIMuND9YaVVHtkfpvzhEx2XvVVHHeVLmOU8YnYZ8kXzan6 gkWFDDZKPtQpIeLhi7cdQEnWNbP0m6OHF4vU+vo/K55JIMl9CIl5bVynxnYGZaiqV+Wu xKNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ySeRgeePeIOky4PKyyHsMdElVwJDEyFyAGMLx2YDEEc=; b=dgQSfBX04GrnmR5zSx6NG7eycRY1CCVmqjMqtwiRg07OT5nd1tO4fl+qdaJ4djxW+2 hglcNsfQfXbUzl3TVMB7pPr9j6J7A2gQjD2rZYuiSDQZtWcPkwwjlNQYTcgeXeRlJy1P srAb4X96VW81fhY2RohPftkIBYpS9KzMWyVF9wfdbRL6/zzAC0Bu+8CWmpxRNrx3CIcr 6/avisXoAv58+XXk+0XzZDh2jM8gXnacB774FWrn4P8q9MU5oGAEnpItbd/5tGlLUFkI +u83C3lUtIJA27dmLCq0wIGPG3lSslxvTJ2+3LSAwNBbip2REisgXe07RS7w8OyqCG1o ek3A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7p9Ft/EThWJoVX/ImCaE0mCfhi62TIWPRocqKY/VouwhaRV4t kew3vb8q1nppz8TnV03Zrc8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytdmuyi2cC/FntbTyVLZcRo9j3fURmr6hs7gkHgvFYlMN/GFQCJylcOXnG5z69MgGZt9Y/fw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f851:: with SMTP id d17mr12862819wrq.77.1562491086639; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 02:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p200300dd6712644964be323e195572dc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p200300DD6712644964BE323E195572DC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:dd:6712:6449:64be:323e:1955:72dc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm15139369wmh.46.2019.07.07.02.18.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Jul 2019 02:18:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Tamas Blummer Message-Id: <501EFBBA-8A14-4B64-BD77-1ED5119154EA@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C0F7122-3F55-4ABA-8827-9085F2567FA8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 11:18:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: To: Eric Voskuil References: <0DBC0DEA-C999-4AEE-B2E1-D5337ECD9405@gmail.com> <6B9A04E2-8EEE-40A0-8B39-64AA0F478CAB@voskuil.org> <4mT6iC4Va7Afg15a5NLbddAnF2a_vAcQSXYr_jg_5IyEK2ezblJff7EJZakoqvp4BJlLitt9Zlq1_l5JadR0nVss7VDPW-pv8jXGh7lkFC4=@protonmail.com> <0851B842-34A1-427F-95DC-A1D6AB416FB9@voskuil.org> <8D68DC86-1173-43AC-BC84-FE2834741C13@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 11:43:56 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Generalized covenants with taproot enable riskless or risky lending, prevent credit inflation through fractional reserve X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:18:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_9C0F7122-3F55-4ABA-8827-9085F2567FA8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FA0BFA26-B7B4-4A70-8175-7A12CD25A321" --Apple-Mail=_FA0BFA26-B7B4-4A70-8175-7A12CD25A321 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Eric, Your cryproeconomic theories may describe correctly Bitcoin as money, = but fall short of describing a Bitcoin that would also offer reliable = memory for other uses. In consequence you miss, that: 1. If the reliable memory that enables money would have more uses then = even temporary use of the memory would have utility, therefore value. = Bitcoin as is, does not have consensus rules to enable reliable = alternate uses. 2. Finite supply of coins implies a finite memory capacity of Bitcoin. = Alternate use of the memory requires that units at least temporarily = become un-fungible, enforced by consensus. Alternate uses would then = have to compete for units of memory, which would give rise to a price = paid to those enabling alternate use, even if temoprarily. 3. If giving up control temorarily has a positive price (through 2) and = return of control is certain (enforced by consenus) then the price paid = is riskless interest for those giving up temporary control. 4. If a use requires more units of memory then it imposes higher cost to = use and it since memory units are finite it imposes more severe = scarcity. Further certainly subjective remarks: Although burning and loss is unavoidable and therefore Bitcoin (as is) = is unsustainable we should design systems that they sustain it as long = as possible (as is). Therefore a requirement to burn for any of = unlimited number of uses should be avoided. We currently perceive borrowed money just as good as (fungible with) any = other money. This is a consequence that money actually comes into = existence through someone borrowing it. Money on your account is a loan = you gave the bank and even paper cash is a loan you gave the central = bank. Bitcoin is different as it just is, it is not borrowed into existence. = Therefore it is not fungible with borrowed version of itself. This = however does not imply that its borrowed version is worthless as it = might be worth something if there is a use for it. Tamas Blummer > On Jul 7, 2019, at 03:30, Eric Voskuil wrote: >=20 > I have published a summary here: >=20 > = https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Risk-Free-Return-Fall= acy = >=20 > Barring any new consequential inputs I=E2=80=99ll refrain from further = comment. >=20 > e >=20 --Apple-Mail=_FA0BFA26-B7B4-4A70-8175-7A12CD25A321 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Hi Eric,

Your cryproeconomic theories may = describe correctly Bitcoin as money, but fall short of describing a = Bitcoin that would also offer reliable memory for other uses.

In consequence you miss, = that:

1. If = the reliable memory that enables money would have more uses then even = temporary use of the memory would have utility, therefore value. Bitcoin = as is, does not have consensus rules to enable reliable alternate = uses. 

2. = Finite supply of coins implies a finite memory capacity of Bitcoin. = Alternate use of the memory requires that units at least temporarily = become un-fungible, enforced by consensus. Alternate uses would then = have to compete for units of memory, which would give rise to a price = paid to those enabling alternate use, even if = temoprarily. 

3. If giving up control temorarily has a positive price = (through 2) and return of control is certain (enforced by consenus) then = the price paid is riskless interest for those giving up temporary = control.

4. If = a use requires more units of memory then it imposes higher cost to use = and it since memory units are finite it imposes more severe = scarcity.

Further certainly subjective remarks:

Although burning and = loss is unavoidable and therefore Bitcoin (as is) is unsustainable we = should design systems that they sustain it as long as possible (as is). = Therefore a requirement to burn for any of unlimited number of uses = should be avoided.

We currently perceive borrowed money just as good as = (fungible with) any other money. This is a consequence that money = actually comes into existence through someone borrowing it. Money on = your account is a loan you gave the bank and even paper cash is a loan = you gave the central bank. 

Bitcoin is different as it just is, it = is not borrowed into existence. Therefore it is not fungible with = borrowed version of itself. This however does not imply that its = borrowed version is worthless as it might be worth something if there is = a use for it.

Tamas Blummer

On Jul 7, 2019, at 03:30, Eric = Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org> wrote:

I have published a summary = here:

https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Risk-Free-= Return-Fallacy

Barring any new = consequential inputs I=E2=80=99ll refrain from further = comment.

e


= --Apple-Mail=_FA0BFA26-B7B4-4A70-8175-7A12CD25A321-- --Apple-Mail=_9C0F7122-3F55-4ABA-8827-9085F2567FA8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE6YNJViYMM6Iv5f9e9nKRxRdxORwFAl0huMwACgkQ9nKRxRdx ORwMnwgAuOwedUyp25fNfCIHKojhl9MxWk20TVyrjZMOEWfxeRp7BcVjSvHNjZEb /qtUF8kNZhafC7SDL6rNeSXX0Ijz/Y52jPcZBVWmOLDwebpt9kAlmJKBB310XEJe Yp/pv2DuBzE4tZqFOPGQo0LVoMEKBq25Ujmz07OUeljU6sa+zI6pHZk3VqwO8waC SVZAL2ltXbDm+FpWG0LqTHCIaazOyEJag1LxogaV2rYyGRnEn1h1kyoMHyUADSIp HavaPOldwrj0HkTD2YLE2GFip1qV3J+76NnNvp5CvttWOwpX1CN64lh1fA7eZ9Fh kot+FELsSRc35M7obIuF08HEyJq3pQ== =oShZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_9C0F7122-3F55-4ABA-8827-9085F2567FA8--