From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB75810C2 for ; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:09:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:07:47 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from cock.li (cock.li [176.9.0.140]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6035087 for ; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:09:59 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:02:10 +0000 From: benevolent@cock.li To: Ittay In-Reply-To: References: <20151219184240.GB12893@muck> <219f125cee6ca68fd27016642e38fdf1@xbt.hk> <20151220132842.GA25481@muck> Message-ID: <502120bac44386921f3dcac26ce1ef18@cock.li> X-Sender: benevolent@cock.li User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 04:29:35 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:10:00 -0000 On 2015-12-25 11:15, Ittay via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > All that being said -- it's not great to rely on the potential of > attacks and on threats against the honest large pools out there > (including GHash, which, afaik, did nothing more wrong than being > successful). GHash.IO and double-spending against BetCoin Dice https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=327767.0