public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
@ 2012-10-11 15:46 Gavin Andresen
  2012-10-11 15:59 ` Jeff Garzik
  2012-10-11 17:45 ` steve
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Andresen @ 2012-10-11 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bitcoin Development

Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?


Bitcoin version 0.7.1 release candidate 1 is now available from:
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.7.1/test/

This is a bug-fix minor release.

New features
------------

* Added a boolean argument to the RPC 'stop' command, if true sets
  -detachdb to create standalone database .dat files before shutting down.

* -salvagewallet command-line option, which moves any existing wallet.dat
  to wallet.{timestamp}.dat and then attempts to salvage public/private
  keys and master encryption keys (if the wallet is encrypted) into
  a new wallet.dat. This should only be used if your wallet becomes
  corrupted, and is not intended to replace regular wallet backups.

* Import $DataDir/bootstrap.dat automatically, if it exists.

Dependency changes
------------------

* Qt 4.8.2 for Windows builds

* openssl 1.0.1c

Bug fixes
---------

* When running -testnet, use RPC port 18332 by default.

* Better detection and handling of corrupt wallet.dat and blkindex.dat files.
  Previous versions would crash with a DB_RUNRECOVERY exception, this
  version detects most problems and tells you how to recover if it
  cannot recover itself.

* Fixed an uninitialized variable bug that could cause transactions to
  be reported out of order.

* Fixed a bug that could cause occasional crashes on exit.

* Warn the user that they need to create fresh wallet backups after they
  encrypt their wallet.


-- 
--
Gavin Andresen



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
  2012-10-11 15:46 [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing Gavin Andresen
@ 2012-10-11 15:59 ` Jeff Garzik
  2012-10-11 16:17   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
  2012-10-11 17:45 ` steve
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2012-10-11 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Andresen; +Cc: Bitcoin Development

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?

Posted a call for testing in this forum thread,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117487.0

-- 
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
  2012-10-11 15:59 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2012-10-11 16:17   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arklan Uth Oslin @ 2012-10-11 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Bitcoin Development

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1417 bytes --]

I'd emailed steve last week to try and get a look at the test cases and
such he worked up, but I've not heard from him. Other then that, I'll grab
the RC tonight and go through it.

Arklan

----------
As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the
deepest black, there is life. - Arklan Uth Oslin

I want to leave this world the same way I came into it: backwards and on
fire. - Arklan Uth Oslin



On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Gavin Andresen
> <gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?
>
> Posted a call for testing in this forum thread,
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117487.0
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> exMULTI, Inc.
> jgarzik@exmulti.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2362 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
  2012-10-11 15:46 [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing Gavin Andresen
  2012-10-11 15:59 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2012-10-11 17:45 ` steve
  2012-10-11 17:51   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: steve @ 2012-10-11 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Andresen; +Cc: Bitcoin Development

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On 11/10/2012 16:46, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?

essentially yes - in all seriousness, I have come around to your way
of thinking, it is not worth arguing about. we end up in the same place.

:) nothing is final though. I will be opening it up to Arklan in a bit
(I have a pool match tonight so after that depending on how drunk i
get.) and to another couple of people who have emailed me off list who
would like to be involved in testing.

I have not created any new tests for the new stuff.  this is still the
noddy stuff.

It covers everything that needs to be covered for a newbe or someone
upgrading clients.

and it is in many formats the moment (from wiki to test runner) none
particularly useful (about to import into mantis, just fiddling with
the fields so it does testcases)

I have been trying to separate the tests into what can be automated,
recorded and checked by watching the video and have sanity checks
along the way (published sha and sha256 of the binaries match) -
(obviously the test is flagged to be run manually if there is any doubt)

I did take myself outside and had a little sit down and talk to
myself.  Lets not run before we can walk. I will still keep the grand
ideas, but they are on the back burner. (I got called a blue skies
thinker today, wtf is one of them? I said smiled and said thanks)

the main things we make sure we get tested right are all the GAT tests
in bettermeans.They are more protocol based and should be run against
all releases.  Lets nail that process, peer review it, retest it, then
use that as a basis for The Process. I will temper my zealousness. I
realise that I can come across as bullish or even aggressive in my
emails.  I never mean too.(unless I say I am. That is not an excuse
for my poor english language skills.)

But I still think that the people running the tests should have the
greatest say in what software is used. So once you have access to the
server and the cases feel free to install your favourite software and
see what other people think.

but we have a vague structure and workflow so it will be interesting
to see how it works out.

the git integration will be trivial.

please email me if you would like access.  I am off out in 15 mins but
I promise to have all access sorted by tomorrow.  I am only using 3
vps to show example testing and test platforms.  I would like it if we
could get a technet license with the donations so far, I use mine (and
my msdn) for work.

also check out bettermeans for the formats that I will be using.

bollocks. bollocks. bollocks

https://secure.bettermeans.com/projects/4180

bye bye bettermeans. how we never knew ye.

Gavin, can we get a bitcoin-test mailing list please.  it would be
used for discussion of testing, tools, ideas, chatter, etc.  it would
not be a place reporting bugs... This list seems very focused and I
always feel like I am disrupting things with my emails about test.  I
dont mind admining the list. I would rather be vocal and inclusive, I
dont think the dev list is the place for that.

> 
> 
> Bitcoin version 0.7.1 release candidate 1 is now available from: 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.7.1/test/
>
>  This is a bug-fix minor release.
> 
> New features ------------
> 
> * Added a boolean argument to the RPC 'stop' command, if true sets 
> -detachdb to create standalone database .dat files before shutting
> down.
> 
> * -salvagewallet command-line option, which moves any existing
> wallet.dat to wallet.{timestamp}.dat and then attempts to salvage
> public/private keys and master encryption keys (if the wallet is
> encrypted) into a new wallet.dat. This should only be used if your
> wallet becomes corrupted, and is not intended to replace regular
> wallet backups.
> 
> * Import $DataDir/bootstrap.dat automatically, if it exists.
> 
> Dependency changes ------------------
> 
> * Qt 4.8.2 for Windows builds
> 
> * openssl 1.0.1c
> 
> Bug fixes ---------
> 
> * When running -testnet, use RPC port 18332 by default.
> 
> * Better detection and handling of corrupt wallet.dat and
> blkindex.dat files. Previous versions would crash with a
> DB_RUNRECOVERY exception, this version detects most problems and
> tells you how to recover if it cannot recover itself.
> 
> * Fixed an uninitialized variable bug that could cause transactions
> to be reported out of order.
> 
> * Fixed a bug that could cause occasional crashes on exit.
> 
> * Warn the user that they need to create fresh wallet backups after
> they encrypt their wallet.
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQdwWxAAoJEFvEB9dQFvtQiuMIAJpdu23biq56apMO/KfqmSB0
kQPflDD2XMxTknfqzRs35/EFgL0mJ/cYfY3qTW9JOWL/cit4ieq2EA4P3uQeFFDC
NCxIuDxOzOIaZ+SzRZENXdpVWKRNP1RgUCANm3YfrJBlavr9a/om36nP1IK0W4MB
QcPXrrZvipt1xhx1G/V6NvYbZA3lTAJBFzuz2oRJNwlYoExJFw8EHBypa67BUNOj
NDg1Wu5Ppyq7dZbgfhw4HxIIvgwn/vaSm/tX6HJxyKN7HUJIbIyQrSbPGUvWCsBW
KI6e88DPdG0x0ltqVXja+51n3F9G4H/zTIbB0GyiRDn0GcGwi/GolF5PAgz0tR8=
=zniH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
  2012-10-11 17:45 ` steve
@ 2012-10-11 17:51   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
  2012-10-11 19:20     ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arklan Uth Oslin @ 2012-10-11 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: steve; +Cc: Bitcoin Development

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6377 bytes --]

i'll second the bitcoin test list.

Arklan

----------
As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the
deepest black, there is life. - Arklan Uth Oslin

I want to leave this world the same way I came into it: backwards and on
fire. - Arklan Uth Oslin



On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:45 AM, steve <steve@mistfpga.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/10/2012 16:46, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> > Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?
>
> essentially yes - in all seriousness, I have come around to your way
> of thinking, it is not worth arguing about. we end up in the same place.
>
> :) nothing is final though. I will be opening it up to Arklan in a bit
> (I have a pool match tonight so after that depending on how drunk i
> get.) and to another couple of people who have emailed me off list who
> would like to be involved in testing.
>
> I have not created any new tests for the new stuff.  this is still the
> noddy stuff.
>
> It covers everything that needs to be covered for a newbe or someone
> upgrading clients.
>
> and it is in many formats the moment (from wiki to test runner) none
> particularly useful (about to import into mantis, just fiddling with
> the fields so it does testcases)
>
> I have been trying to separate the tests into what can be automated,
> recorded and checked by watching the video and have sanity checks
> along the way (published sha and sha256 of the binaries match) -
> (obviously the test is flagged to be run manually if there is any doubt)
>
> I did take myself outside and had a little sit down and talk to
> myself.  Lets not run before we can walk. I will still keep the grand
> ideas, but they are on the back burner. (I got called a blue skies
> thinker today, wtf is one of them? I said smiled and said thanks)
>
> the main things we make sure we get tested right are all the GAT tests
> in bettermeans.They are more protocol based and should be run against
> all releases.  Lets nail that process, peer review it, retest it, then
> use that as a basis for The Process. I will temper my zealousness. I
> realise that I can come across as bullish or even aggressive in my
> emails.  I never mean too.(unless I say I am. That is not an excuse
> for my poor english language skills.)
>
> But I still think that the people running the tests should have the
> greatest say in what software is used. So once you have access to the
> server and the cases feel free to install your favourite software and
> see what other people think.
>
> but we have a vague structure and workflow so it will be interesting
> to see how it works out.
>
> the git integration will be trivial.
>
> please email me if you would like access.  I am off out in 15 mins but
> I promise to have all access sorted by tomorrow.  I am only using 3
> vps to show example testing and test platforms.  I would like it if we
> could get a technet license with the donations so far, I use mine (and
> my msdn) for work.
>
> also check out bettermeans for the formats that I will be using.
>
> bollocks. bollocks. bollocks
>
> https://secure.bettermeans.com/projects/4180
>
> bye bye bettermeans. how we never knew ye.
>
> Gavin, can we get a bitcoin-test mailing list please.  it would be
> used for discussion of testing, tools, ideas, chatter, etc.  it would
> not be a place reporting bugs... This list seems very focused and I
> always feel like I am disrupting things with my emails about test.  I
> dont mind admining the list. I would rather be vocal and inclusive, I
> dont think the dev list is the place for that.
>
> >
> >
> > Bitcoin version 0.7.1 release candidate 1 is now available from:
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.7.1/test/
> >
> >  This is a bug-fix minor release.
> >
> > New features ------------
> >
> > * Added a boolean argument to the RPC 'stop' command, if true sets
> > -detachdb to create standalone database .dat files before shutting
> > down.
> >
> > * -salvagewallet command-line option, which moves any existing
> > wallet.dat to wallet.{timestamp}.dat and then attempts to salvage
> > public/private keys and master encryption keys (if the wallet is
> > encrypted) into a new wallet.dat. This should only be used if your
> > wallet becomes corrupted, and is not intended to replace regular
> > wallet backups.
> >
> > * Import $DataDir/bootstrap.dat automatically, if it exists.
> >
> > Dependency changes ------------------
> >
> > * Qt 4.8.2 for Windows builds
> >
> > * openssl 1.0.1c
> >
> > Bug fixes ---------
> >
> > * When running -testnet, use RPC port 18332 by default.
> >
> > * Better detection and handling of corrupt wallet.dat and
> > blkindex.dat files. Previous versions would crash with a
> > DB_RUNRECOVERY exception, this version detects most problems and
> > tells you how to recover if it cannot recover itself.
> >
> > * Fixed an uninitialized variable bug that could cause transactions
> > to be reported out of order.
> >
> > * Fixed a bug that could cause occasional crashes on exit.
> >
> > * Warn the user that they need to create fresh wallet backups after
> > they encrypt their wallet.
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQdwWxAAoJEFvEB9dQFvtQiuMIAJpdu23biq56apMO/KfqmSB0
> kQPflDD2XMxTknfqzRs35/EFgL0mJ/cYfY3qTW9JOWL/cit4ieq2EA4P3uQeFFDC
> NCxIuDxOzOIaZ+SzRZENXdpVWKRNP1RgUCANm3YfrJBlavr9a/om36nP1IK0W4MB
> QcPXrrZvipt1xhx1G/V6NvYbZA3lTAJBFzuz2oRJNwlYoExJFw8EHBypa67BUNOj
> NDg1Wu5Ppyq7dZbgfhw4HxIIvgwn/vaSm/tX6HJxyKN7HUJIbIyQrSbPGUvWCsBW
> KI6e88DPdG0x0ltqVXja+51n3F9G4H/zTIbB0GyiRDn0GcGwi/GolF5PAgz0tR8=
> =zniH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7889 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
  2012-10-11 17:51   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
@ 2012-10-11 19:20     ` Jeff Garzik
  2012-10-11 20:08       ` Arklan Uth Oslin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2012-10-11 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arklan Uth Oslin; +Cc: Bitcoin Development

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Arklan Uth Oslin
<arklan.uthoslin@gmail.com> wrote:
> i'll second the bitcoin test list.

As you like, but... bitcoin-devel is quite low traffic, so there is
not exactly an issue of crowding.  And a separate list means people
cannot chime in as easily.

-- 
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing
  2012-10-11 19:20     ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2012-10-11 20:08       ` Arklan Uth Oslin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arklan Uth Oslin @ 2012-10-11 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Bitcoin Development

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 963 bytes --]

while perfectly true for now, hopefully that won't remain the case as we
get people on board with testing. ...ok, sure, it might be a while... but
having the separate list with help with archival type stuff and other
things eventually. we'll see how useful it actually is in time.

Arklan

----------
As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the
deepest black, there is life. - Arklan Uth Oslin

I want to leave this world the same way I came into it: backwards and on
fire. - Arklan Uth Oslin



On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Arklan Uth Oslin
> <arklan.uthoslin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > i'll second the bitcoin test list.
>
> As you like, but... bitcoin-devel is quite low traffic, so there is
> not exactly an issue of crowding.  And a separate list means people
> cannot chime in as easily.
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> exMULTI, Inc.
> jgarzik@exmulti.com
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1518 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-11 20:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-11 15:46 [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing Gavin Andresen
2012-10-11 15:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-11 16:17   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
2012-10-11 17:45 ` steve
2012-10-11 17:51   ` Arklan Uth Oslin
2012-10-11 19:20     ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-11 20:08       ` Arklan Uth Oslin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox