From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8A811A8 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:55:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA914103 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.190] (63.135.62.197.nwinternet.com [63.135.62.197] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id tBUNtbSt001470 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:55:38 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E3CCFBFA-9616-40EE-8232-696703E7377E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: Jonathan Toomim In-Reply-To: <16BFC301-58C1-49F9-B2E5-A2C09C82A8CA@toom.im> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:56:43 -0800 Message-Id: <51D6E17C-4466-44D6-9BC5-618BE4A2332C@toom.im> References: <1bf64a5b514d57ca37744ae5f5238149@openmailbox.org> <20151230190043.GJ18200@mcelrath.org> <16BFC301-58C1-49F9-B2E5-A2C09C82A8CA@toom.im> To: Bitcoin Dev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVZz8tSatBJftor+9t+ZpxFMY54TONoHDUi5wYTIj66wJ+ZV8eXRNkTymHFud4vpIFUO6yxcE5qQ1DODWHmR8XPu X-Sonic-ID: C;sv7p0lCv5RGT+P8vZz0oYQ== M;ItWY01Cv5RGT+P8vZz0oYQ== X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 3.8/5.0 by cerberusd X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:55:41 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E3CCFBFA-9616-40EE-8232-696703E7377E Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C00AD25B-1A0F-43F0-B75C-2D448A3CCA18" --Apple-Mail=_C00AD25B-1A0F-43F0-B75C-2D448A3CCA18 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:49 PM, Jonathan Toomim wrote: > Since we've been relying on the trustworthiness of miners during soft = forks in the past (and it only failed us once!), why not make it explicit? (Sorry for the premature send.) --Apple-Mail=_C00AD25B-1A0F-43F0-B75C-2D448A3CCA18 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:49 PM, Jonathan = Toomim <j@toom.im> = wrote:

Since we've been relying on the = trustworthiness of miners during soft forks in the past (and it only = failed us once!), why not

make it = explicit?

(Sorry for the premature = send.)

= --Apple-Mail=_C00AD25B-1A0F-43F0-B75C-2D448A3CCA18-- --Apple-Mail=_E3CCFBFA-9616-40EE-8232-696703E7377E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWhG87AAoJEIEuMk4MG0P1fZIH/R4ALugeE/Wxp3arXst/2we8 OkFGq/kk0gaZQ5F+26EiKyYBE13JDrne0PJdvtlv2uGw/W0+V3dm7kjtEZk5mBrs 1nHFJeSC6SgZZkWBTzu0rs8yClsRMqMz8Fcv4vIO/bZY/o2iEx/V/S8l27zjEM/r +OIGC+y4x0DvbYdxu8vQ4ijd+6Akjq/2WsHYwABsjX+8zO3jeF4iJGQAyfX5K+zo O96h32+sIrU6QXiN2eMUxZtEVRkNN7HrEWN4XO/j4CRJqE/Gij7Ps7wcEObBWL9p K1Ryv395J5qFJr5j067r+l9NQw2N+xyM0NqEWGMss+5bO9Q+t4/r280A7H3ITFE= =8Pto -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E3CCFBFA-9616-40EE-8232-696703E7377E--