From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V9Z9T-0007fD-TA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:22:07 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from entix.nl ([178.22.57.40] helo=mail.entix.nl) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1V9Z9R-0004EZ-TE for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:22:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.entix.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C7A164133 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:56:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.entix.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (entix.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTnNW9SlLItl for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:56:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.69] (specht [92.64.70.65]) by mail.entix.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE6AA16400D for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:56:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <520B6278.9050909@bitonic.nl> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:56:56 +0200 From: Jouke Hofman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1V9Z9R-0004EZ-TE Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol: BIP 70, 71, 72 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:22:08 -0000 On 08/07/2013 11:10 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > I'd also like to hear from merchants: any issue with your payment > processing server having "broadcast transaction" functionality? > On the contrary, we would prefer to broadcast the transaction ourselves.