public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kjj <bitcoin-devel@jerviss.org>
To: Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] we can all relax now
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:33:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5279D49D.5050807@jerviss.org> (raw)

One of the things that really gets me going is when someone devises a 
model, tests it against itself, and then pretends that they've learned 
something about the real world.

Naturally, the Selfish Mining paper is exactly this sort of nonsense.  
Their model is one with no latency, and one where the attacker has total 
visibility across the network.  An iterated FSM is not a suitable 
simulation of the bitcoin system.  The bitcoin network does not have 
states, and to the extent that you can pretend that we do, you can't 
simulate transitions between them with static probabilities.

The authors understand this deep down inside, even though they didn't 
work out the implications.  They handwave the issue by assuming a total 
sybil attack, and in true academic spirit, they don't realize that the 
condition necessary for the attack is far, far worse than the attack itself.

Greg said he'd like to run some simulations, and I'm thinking about it 
too.  Unfortunately, he is busy all week, and I'm lazy (and also busy 
for most of tomorrow).

If neither of us get to it first, I'm willing to pitch in 1 BTC as a 
bounty for building a general bitcoin network simulator framework. The 
simulator should be able to account for latency between nodes, and 
ideally within a node.  It needs to be able to simulate an attacker that 
owns varying fractions of the network, and make decisions based only on 
what the attacker actually knows.  It needs to be able to simulate this 
"attack" and should be generic enough to be easily modified for other 
crazy schemes.

(Bounty offer is serious, but expires in one year [based on the earliest 
timestamp that my mail server puts on this email], and /may/ be subject 
to change if the price on any reputable exchange breaks 1000 USD per BTC 
in that period.)

Basically, the lack of a decent network simulator is what allowed this 
paper to get press.  If the author had been able to see the importance 
of the stuff he was ignoring, we wouldn't be wasting so much time 
correcting him (and sadly the reporters that have no way to check his 
claims).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=324413.msg3495663#msg3495663





             reply	other threads:[~2013-11-06  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-06  5:33 kjj [this message]
2013-11-06  9:26 ` [Bitcoin-development] we can all relax now Frank F
2013-11-06 11:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-11-06 18:06   ` Christophe Biocca
2013-11-07  3:44     ` Peter Todd
2013-11-07  4:15       ` Kyle Jerviss
2013-11-07  4:33         ` Peter Todd
2013-11-07  4:59           ` Kyle Jerviss
2013-11-07 13:09             ` Peter Todd
2013-11-07  4:56       ` Gavin Andresen
2013-11-07 13:24         ` Peter Todd
2013-11-07 16:14           ` Mike Hearn
2013-11-07 18:28             ` Daniel Lidstrom
2013-11-08 19:49               ` Andreas M. Antonopoulos
2013-11-08 20:33                 ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-11-15 10:58               ` Peter Todd
2013-11-07  8:07       ` Jannes Faber
2013-11-07  5:24     ` Kyle Jerviss
2013-11-06 18:17 ` Melvin Carvalho
2013-11-06 22:19 ` Jouke Hofman
2014-05-10 11:05 ` E willbefull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5279D49D.5050807@jerviss.org \
    --to=bitcoin-devel@jerviss.org \
    --cc=Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox