From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VolPO-0000tC-4N for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:44:50 +0000 Received: from bi.petersson.at ([46.4.24.198] helo=petersson.at) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1VolPM-0002pR-Nm for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:44:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.199] (chello084114039092.14.vie.surfer.at [84.114.39.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andreas) by petersson.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FB262380AB8 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 03:46:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52A139F0.2080401@petersson.at> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:44:00 +0100 From: Andreas Petersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1VolPM-0002pR-Nm Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Temporary fee fix X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:44:50 -0000 I know we should all be brainstorming and working on a new fee market. But fact is, it will still take some time and in the meantime users will continue to shout insults at us for the high "fixed" fee of 0,1 mBtc. Even banks sometimes have less fees. (1 of 5 Play Store reviews of Mycelium seem to mention high fees recently) My suggestion: until the market is established let's lower the minimum relay fee per kb to something less. 0,01 mBtc comes to mind. (of course pulling this number out of thin air)