From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WWTED-0002Ji-0y for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:13:57 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of daryltucker.com designates 166.78.160.77 as permitted sender) client-ip=166.78.160.77; envelope-from=daryl@daryltucker.com; helo=neoretro.net; Received: from neoretro.net ([166.78.160.77]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WWTEB-0002Op-Pj for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:13:56 +0000 Received: from [10.1.3.104] (ip72-213-200-160.pn.at.cox.net [72.213.200.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by neoretro.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAB6B1C38F for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53402724.5060304@daryltucker.com> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:54:12 -0500 From: Daryl Tucker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Bitcoin Dev References: <1750679.2ZqEPETxMv@crushinator> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lACBUfwvq2GR7l8KQ33QsOMf9EN6Mocn0" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WWTEB-0002Op-Pj Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:13:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lACBUfwvq2GR7l8KQ33QsOMf9EN6Mocn0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000308020507040107050108" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000308020507040107050108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable YYYY-MM-DD sorts more naturally. On 04/05/2014 06:28 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Matt Whitlock > wrote: > > On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Tim=F3n wrote: > > I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY > and YYYY-DD-MM. > > Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely > numeric date format that is unambiguous across all cultures is > YYYY-MM-DD. (No culture uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems > to think so.) > > > Let's not waste any time shed-painting this. I'd like to finish this > discussion at once: > > https://xkcd.com/1179/ > > Wladimir > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development --=20 Daryl Tucker daryl@daryltucker.com --------------000308020507040107050108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
YYYY-MM-DD sorts more naturally.


On 04/05/2014 06:28 AM, Wladimir wrote= :

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Mat= t Whitlock <b= ip@mattwhitlock.name> wrote:
On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Timón wrote:
> I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and YYYY-DD-MM.

Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely numeric date format that is unambiguous across all cultures is YYYY-MM-DD. (No culture uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems to think so.)

Let's not waste any time shed-painting this. I'd like to finish this discussion at once:

https://xkcd.com/1179/

Wladimir




----------------------------------------------------=
--------------------------



_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l=
istinfo/bitcoin-development


--=20
Daryl Tucker
daryl@daryltucker.com
--------------000308020507040107050108-- --lACBUfwvq2GR7l8KQ33QsOMf9EN6Mocn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTQCckAAoJEEa7mQCz93xzfBgP/jxdbBAuJnJl3IAIQhQ2fn3q 0Wjl83WhBcpI5ZY2HaUDNYhCMG3Mh9SuvT0W9Rm//NXCHT0KMhr8jlS8nGx/HtMV ztkaiCbwyJSdvSmY+4qG/+ULMpumY512ue3mjBuqb97m6bLfbtkorpMwH3eS4Hf4 OwzzAdUons0mkZCENs+N3MJtK/peZiKl6tMqP+R2GvYuh+L5ev50oQ26pvJrSZLB qxOhxDwOV7EGfwGgZ4rNnjU6JcHqlrNRyXN+eZd0grJxu/B7q6XNIs4NyZmY6fuu FrhPXM597GDcO0w2PMcdm7TWPw/0+1rJMgB5D/+sjnM6K6ZhwAlbaV2pWXYBVd+L Z3WN2kRpQLyMLyK8gXD9Sfq7NMa7YVyxqdmfM+x37S0pG4RksZzHwH/r7Tp7Jtw/ q0FdRbq3ZQpo5I2S67i8JmY1sPffE2YKeLrcUkBYp4Yl7zl8EwTpSzdjOB2rxP9F 3LTOksIC+1rXQmoBBf9KeedUTbx9bf8siiKsNQWNpg1YWAyf96KXRIzPzbx9XrHx llkY3XlxvWagbGe5NuEEBnuP8/sARHVEAqFTPvGKYf2jepkc+vLnkvWg2KiOjJVm jYleornPr6+hZbNempNjilpJshStlVbEy4pi1muG/fyUWqPQlsdBvFOOLsYQ7Y0J O15bYEJgF6LpzwXDksgC =jqcL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lACBUfwvq2GR7l8KQ33QsOMf9EN6Mocn0--