From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>) id 1WaSgV-0004ID-BA
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.192.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.192.47; envelope-from=kevinsisco61784@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qg0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qg0-f47.google.com ([209.85.192.47])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WaSgU-0002u9-KS
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:39 +0000
Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id i50so4063109qgf.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.163.10 with SMTP id y10mr3805255qax.102.1397665653084;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (ool-43521013.dyn.optonline.net. [67.82.16.19])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	w14sm25331395qaw.11.2014.04.16.09.27.31 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <534EAF71.4090401@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:27:29 -0400
From: Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
References: <CA+s+GJDdENtqQt1f+L5htuuyPxUxsq0prLQFBLirTjJz0nG1gw@mail.gmail.com>	<534E9DDC.7000502@gmail.com>	<CAPg+sBg-LBHx4sTR1QuK_-t1Yb+N+Vsi9BsyQ41vaWB6gFEHvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJDaLoDoxORfKEKeUpKgytwSUhH67Oj2_e6WoRup8eMG=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJDaLoDoxORfKEKeUpKgytwSUhH67Oj2_e6WoRup8eMG=w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------080803030704000500010503"
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [209.85.192.47 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(kevinsisco61784[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (kevinsisco61784[at]gmail.com)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY         From and body contain different freemails
X-Headers-End: 1WaSgU-0002u9-KS
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in
 Windows XP (or drop support?)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:39 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080803030704000500010503
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/16/2014 11:28 AM, Wladimir wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pieter Wuille 
> <pieter.wuille@gmail.com <mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com
>     <mailto:kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > I think we should get to the bottom of this.  Should we assume
>     that xp is
>     > not secure enough?
>
>     Yes.
>
>
> It will quickly grow extremely insecure.
>
> People will be actively analyzing patches to post-XP versions to find 
> security problems that are patched there, to see if they can be 
> exploited on XP.
>
> Wladimir
>
Should we then add an alert message to wallet installers such as, "Such 
and such will not run on windows xp?"


-- 
Kevin


--------------080803030704000500010503
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/16/2014 11:28 AM, Wladimir wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+s+GJDaLoDoxORfKEKeUpKgytwSUhH67Oj2_e6WoRup8eMG=w@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:20 PM,
            Pieter Wuille <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.com" target="_blank">pieter.wuille@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div class="">On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kevin &lt;<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:kevinsisco61784@gmail.com">kevinsisco61784@gmail.com</a>&gt;
                wrote:<br>
                &gt; I think we should get to the bottom of this.
                 Should we assume that xp is<br>
                &gt; not secure enough?<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              Yes.<br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>It will quickly grow extremely insecure.<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>People will be actively analyzing patches to post-XP
              versions to find security problems that are patched there,
              to see if they can be exploited on XP.<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>Wladimir<br>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Should we then add an alert message to wallet installers such as,
    "Such and such will not run on windows xp?"<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Kevin
</pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------080803030704000500010503--