From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WaV3K-00041G-Pn for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:59:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.52; envelope-from=kevinsisco61784@gmail.com; helo=mail-qa0-f52.google.com; Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WaV3J-0008Uc-BN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:59:22 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id s7so9161807qap.11 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:59:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.48.77 with SMTP id n71mr4781709qga.90.1397674755702; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.115] (ool-43521013.dyn.optonline.net. [67.82.16.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm44951796qat.18.2014.04.16.11.59.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <534ED2FE.8030208@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:59:10 -0400 From: Kevin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: <534E9DDC.7000502@gmail.com> <534EAF71.4090401@gmail.com> <534EB158.7080506@monetize.io> <5D7F6FBB-3487-44F8-B46C-99EF7BB4A9B2@icloudtools.net> In-Reply-To: <5D7F6FBB-3487-44F8-B46C-99EF7BB4A9B2@icloudtools.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020400040306090805040505" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kevinsisco61784[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (kevinsisco61784[at]gmail.com) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WaV3J-0008Uc-BN Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:59:22 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020400040306090805040505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/16/2014 12:41 PM, Chris Williams wrote: > It may not be our place to say whether XP is secure or not, but if we say that we support it then we have to run test passes against XP as a platform, and if an XP user reports a bug, then we have to do something to address it. So, it becomes a test and support issue, not a security issue. > > That's why it doesn't make sense to support an OS platform that the original vendor (MS) no longer supports themselves. > > On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Mark Friedenbach wrote: > >> On 04/16/2014 09:27 AM, Kevin wrote: >>> Should we then add an alert message to wallet installers such as, "Such >>> and such will not run on windows xp?" >> It's not really our place to police that ... plus it's perfectly safe to >> be running Bitcoin Core as a full node on XP. It's just the wallet >> functionality that people should be careful about. We're talking about >> such a small intersection of people who are running XP, have systems >> powerful enough to run Bitcoin Core, and use the wallet functionality. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their >> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, >> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development Okay, so we simply stop supporting it. Should bitcoin pull support altogether? -- Kevin --------------020400040306090805040505 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 4/16/2014 12:41 PM, Chris Williams wrote:
It may not be our place to say whether XP is secure or not, but if we say that we support it then we have to run test passes against XP as a platform, and if an XP user reports a bug, then we have to do something to address it.  So, it becomes a test and support issue, not a security issue.

That’s why it doesn’t make sense to support an OS platform that the original vendor (MS) no longer supports themselves.

On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io> wrote:


On 04/16/2014 09:27 AM, Kevin wrote:

Should we then add an alert message to wallet installers such as, "Such
and such will not run on windows xp?"

It's not really our place to police that ... plus it's perfectly safe to
be running Bitcoin Core as a full node on XP. It's just the wallet
functionality that people should be careful about. We're talking about
such a small intersection of people who are running XP, have systems
powerful enough to run Bitcoin Core, and use the wallet functionality.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


      

      

      

      
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech

      

      

      

      
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


    

    Okay, so we simply stop supporting it.  Should bitcoin pull support
    altogether?

    

    

    
-- 
Kevin


  


--------------020400040306090805040505--