From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd2BZ-0006Oh-Oh for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:46:21 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd2BY-0006c9-DK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:46:21 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b57so1084861eek.7 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:46:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qwnnDR43Uh9z/K8aV/MSF+Va/Xs6dMmtb0khUIeDRAU=; b=GIQFDWaf++lTmnLvh7EKJv/CcrrxppBSuzKn2sggiwwYOhu8tE42bdgWzlwIS+9hCA ABWMyhGVgzDJHRBnMauUxN/v9qaTnw/8nyUftRLhtgIZ5/+kRJk8NF+UHYZ8nhd65wU9 UJIVz7tEy9aD4bQbsdDVmFe73M02MeQAP7Ov44O6CV60qwwwY5dbh7n2SH1YVfIOhuwB a0DZOHqL5svbhdijqpVq4M2duWVU2SLE4OoFRygqc1uBc8Og7xK0RGm57KfMJqWSaWYf 5M18ELweD5EuK/l1bdJN+IurNx72z9cN60fvWCdAJ8qJPx6iVYKALxsvaOD82/rRxxf3 qFKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm9EMD85RP8Eg7pcXjIK0+VqPVDp6blkyd+hNMHNKdF3jaz737Ht5unfGqB9QXKNraVZmm/ X-Received: by 10.14.183.7 with SMTP id p7mr11400854eem.107.1398278773794; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y51sm8630883eeu.0.2014.04.23.11.46.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53580A73.9070208@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:46:11 +0200 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bitcoin Dev References: <53344FF8.7030204@gk2.sk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1Wd2BY-0006c9-DK Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:46:21 -0000 On 04/23/2014 08:39 PM, Tier Nolan wrote: > A merchant could easily send 20 addresses in a row to customers and none of > them bother to actually buy anything. Such merchant would surely use some merchant system instead of generic wallet software. > Setting the gap limit to high is just a small extra cost in that case. Not if you have 100 accounts on 10 different devices. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak