From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd3Ou-0002IG-Ky for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:04:12 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd3Ot-0003ub-LW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:04:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c13so1124668eek.37 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:04:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lwayVgKKOAqlTpb1OrR885/qZ+0xQevy21ClW6/qeZw=; b=Qm/M1RPld+TnbWFBgDiRgfvZJ/GAhDg+8WJNeQ0hsY1ZkvgOtOp108krttDDQK+FJ2 WDH1wgSJRkGdO6s/A6iPUq/rVCKV/XB6Jt5hJxgE5+O+v8XwtgT+LYcqUTFf5fx2DJZm 8sSUObu9FfQBEFaGRy/WumcywNPFijgofR7ncDP9wtz6TbcnkhTHHue30U5yr/fn0a+n 99LJyALfV3qdj2/NwEr2zlp58Ucq+Kj3ZTYJLW7Wojn0/PyKE4C4Z1h3JMYDfeTlDDqZ tR/YdBbPaWDsaTqaKkoJup+IZDvVQ7ShIk/SGl/nl/kxhg7dchCQeT2O5hviNdhHftI4 Z6tA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm4WwWn07vJCd/r8a9gAYJr5DU1PsasNYXuwm2WWuZpW3tBD30nmuuHTw832CuygH7gtzs6 X-Received: by 10.15.111.206 with SMTP id cj54mr64927151eeb.8.1398283445366; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 48sm9171558eee.2.2014.04.23.13.04.03 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53581CB3.2000109@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:04:03 +0200 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" References: <201404231955.09287.luke@dashjr.org> <201404232001.06679.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: <201404232001.06679.luke@dashjr.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1Wd3Ot-0003ub-LW Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:04:12 -0000 On 04/23/2014 10:01 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > Yes, it should scan all possible (under the BIP-defined structure) branches > regardless of which features it supports. So you suggest to scan for accounts, show balances but don't allow user to spend them? Does not seem right to me. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak